• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Int J Infect Dis . Localized end-of-outbreak determination for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): examples from clusters in Japan

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Infect Dis


. 2021 Mar 1;S1201-9712(21)00192-2.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.106. Online ahead of print.
Localized end-of-outbreak determination for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): examples from clusters in Japan


Natalie M Linton[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrei R Akhmetzhanov[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hiroshi Nishiura[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives: End-of-outbreak declarations are an important component of outbreak response as they indicate that public health and social interventions may be relaxed or lapsed. The present study aimed to assess end-of-outbreak probabilities for clusters of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases detected during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.
Methods: We computed a statistical model for end-of-outbreak determination that accounted for the reporting delay for new cases. Four clusters representing different social contexts and time points during the first wave of the epidemic were selected and their end-of-outbreak probabilities were evaluated.
Results: The speed of end-of-outbreak determination was most closely tied to outbreak size. Notably, accounting underascertainment of cases led to later end-of-outbreak determinations. In addition, end-of-outbreak determination was closely related to estimates of case dispersionk and the effective reproduction number R[SUB]e[/SUB]. Increasing local transmission (R[SUB]e[/SUB]>1) leads to greater uncertainty in the probability estimates.
Conclusions: When public health measures are effective, lowerR[SUB]e[/SUB] (less transmission on average) and larger k (lower risk of superspreading) will be in effect and end-of-outbreak determinations can be declared with greater confidence. The application of end-of-outbreak probabilities can help distinguish between local extinction and low levels of transmission, and communicating these end-of-outbreak probabilities can help inform public health decision-making with relation to the appropriate use of resources.

Keywords: Elimination; Epidemic; Epidemiology; Extinction; Mathematical model; Transmission dynamics.
 
Back
Top Bottom