• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Int J Infect Dis . Comparison of the immunogenicity of adjuvanted and conventional egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccines among healthcare person

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Infect Dis


. 2025 Nov 11:108205.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2025.108205. Online ahead of print. Comparison of the immunogenicity of adjuvanted and conventional egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccines among healthcare personnel in Lima, Peru: A randomized controlled trial

Perrine Marcenac[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Giselle Soto[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Tat Yau[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joseph Daniel Carreon[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Candice Romero[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Miriam Gonzales[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Sayda La Rosa[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Carmen Sofia Arriola[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michael Prouty[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Roger A Hernández Díaz[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Fiorela Alvarez Romero[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Alejandro Llanos-Cuentas[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Eduardo D Matos Prado[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Maria Silva[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ashley Fowlkes[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Min Z Levine[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lindsey M Duca[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Joan Neyra[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Objectives: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether adjuvanted quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (aIIV4) generates superior immunogenicity against influenza viruses compared to conventional quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) among healthcare personnel (HCP) in Lima, Peru.
Methods: During 2022‒2023, we randomized 192 HCP aged ≥18 years to receive 2022 Southern Hemisphere IIV4 or aIIV4 and collected pre-, one-month post-, and six-months post-vaccination sera. Geometric mean titers (GMTs), GMT ratios, seroconversion rates (SCR), and seroprotection rates (SPR) were compared against vaccine reference viruses-influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), B/Victoria, and B/Yamagata-using hemagglutination inhibition assays.
Results: Most HCP (77‒99%) had titers ≥40 following vaccination. One-month post-vaccination, aIIV4 induced higher GMTs (GMT ratio: 1.7 [95% CI 1.1‒2.7]) and SCR (88.4% [80.4‒93.4] vs. 62.1% [52.1‒71.2]) against A(H1N1)pdm09 and higher SCR (82.1% [73.2‒88.5] vs. 62.1% [52.1‒71.2]) against A(H3N2) compared to IIV4. At six months, aIIV4 induced higher SPR against A(H3N2) (90.4% [82.8‒94.9] vs. 74.0% [64.4‒81.7]) than IIV4. IIV4 recipients vaccinated the preceding influenza season had lower odds of seroconverting to A(H1N1)pdm09 compared to IIV4 recipients who were not vaccinated (aOR: 0.29 [0.13‒0.63], p=0.002).
Conclusion: These findings provide insights into the benefits of an enhanced influenza vaccine (aIIV4) to help overcome the immune blunting effects of repeat vaccination among HCP.

Keywords: healthcare personnel; influenza; vaccination.

 
Back
Top Bottom