• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc . Comparison of 5 Acute Pulmonary Embolism Mortality Risk Scores in Patients with COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc


. 2022 Feb 28;100984.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100984. Online ahead of print.
Comparison of 5 Acute Pulmonary Embolism Mortality Risk Scores in Patients with COVID-19


Tiago Rodrigues[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Beatriz Valente Silva[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rui Plácido[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Carlos Mendonça[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Maria Luísa Urbano[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Joana Rigueira[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ana G Almeida[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fausto J Pinto[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to explore the short-term outcomes among patients with acute PE and COVID-19 and to further determine and compare the performance of the different prognostic scores (PESI, sPESI, BOVA, FAST and ESC scores) for risk-stratification in this scenario.
Methods: Retrospective single-centre study of 85 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and PE admitted to the Emergency Department (ED). The diagnostic accuracy of each above-mentioned prognostic score was calculated post hoc, and their discriminative power was evaluated through an AUC curve.
Results: Among the 85 patients, all-cause death occurred within 7 days for 6 patients (7.1%) and within 30 days for 14 patients (16.5%). Despite being older and having a higher percentage of altered mental status on presentation, non-survivors patients did not differ from survivors regarding comorbidities, traditional risk factors for venous thromboembolism and signs and symptoms at the ED presentation.Each risk stratification tool had modest discriminative power for 7-day mortality (AUC range, 0.601-0.730) with slightly lower discrimination for 30-day mortality (AUC range, 0.543-0.638). The pair-wise comparison of ROC curves showed that PESI had better predictive value for short-term mortality than ESC score (z test = 3.92, p=0.001) and sPESI (z test =2.43, p=0.015); there is no significant difference between PESI and BOVA score (z test = 1.05, p=0.295) and FAST score (z test = 0.986, p=0.324).
Conclusion: The most common risk-stratification tools for PE had modest discriminative power to predict short-term mortality in patients with acute PE and COVID-19.

Keywords: Coronavirus; Pulmonary embolism; SARS-CoV-2 infection; mortality risk scores; prognostic factors.
 
Back
Top Bottom