• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Influenza Virus: A Single Noninfectious Interferon Induction-Suppressing Particle Blocks Expression of Interferon-Inducing Particles

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2011 Dec 2. [Epub ahead of print]
Influenza Virus: A Single Noninfectious Interferon Induction-Suppressing Particle Blocks Expression of Interferon-Inducing Particles.
Malinoski CP, Marcus PI.
Source

Laboratory for Virus and Interferon Research, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut , Storrs, Connecticut.
Abstract

The interferon (IFN)-inducing capacity of influenza virus plays a significant role in the efficacy of candidate live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIVs). IFN is induced by a subpopulation of noninfectious biologically active particles (niBAPs) that can be defined and quantified as IFN-inducing particles (IFPs). When chicken embryonic cells were infected with increasing multiplicities of IFP (m(ifp)), the amount of IFN produced was that expected from a Poisson distribution of cells infected with ≥1 IFP. Problematically, some isolates of influenza virus induced less IFN than expected at higher m(ifp). We postulated that these stocks contained another subpopulation of niBAP, IFN induction-suppressing particles (ISPs). A single ISP was assumed capable of preventing IFN production completely in cells coinfected with IFP. Virus stocks were reconstructed to contain a wide range of ratios of IFP:ISP and used to generate IFN-induction dose-response curves. The deviation of the observed yields of IFN from those expected if the virus stock consisted only of IFP fits well the results expected from a formulation of the Poisson distribution that provides the fraction of IFP-infected cells expected to become coinfected with ISP, and hence not yield IFN, as the ratio IFP:ISP decreases. The ideal LAIV might be thought to contain little or no ISP so as to maximize IFN production; however, the most effective LAIV appear to regulate the production of IFN. Thus, it is possible that an optimal ratio of IFP:ISP may exist to produce more effective LAIV, an event that may sometimes occur in nature, or be reconstructed.

PMID:
22136418
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22136418
 
Back
Top Bottom