• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Influenza Other Respir Viruses . Human Immune Response to Influenza Neuraminidase After Vaccination: A Systematic Review

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Influenza Other Respir Viruses


. 2025 Dec;19(12):e70192.
doi: 10.1111/irv.70192. Human Immune Response to Influenza Neuraminidase After Vaccination: A Systematic Review

Vardhini Ganesh[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Justin Iampietro[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Saranya Sridhar[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ana P Goncalvez[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Licensed influenza vaccines primarily target hemagglutinin (HA)-related immunity, but neuraminidase (NA)-based immunity is gaining attention as an independent correlate of protection. Inactivated influenza vaccines contain unspecified quantities of residual NA, with limited understanding of the resulting antibody induction and durability.
Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Trialtrove to identify studies reporting NA-related immunity following influenza vaccination. Primary outcomes included pre-existing and post-vaccination NA-inhibiting (NAI) antibody titers.
Results: Analysis of 40 articles, predominantly examining split-virus vaccines, revealed NAI antibody titers increased 5-7-fold at days 8-30 post-vaccination compared to baseline across all three NA (sub)types. NAI antibody geometric mean titers showed greater variability against N1 and N2 than against influenza B virus NAs. No significant differences in pre-vaccination and post-vaccination NAI antibody titers were observed between adults (18-64 years) and the elderly (≥ 65 years) for the N1 subtype. However, statistical differences were observed post-vaccination (days 8-30) between these age groups for N2 (p = 0.04) and NB (p = 0.01) (sub)types. NAI antibody responses remained durable, persisting at 2-16-fold above pre-vaccination levels through days 91-180.
Conclusion: Current influenza vaccines induce durable NAI responses in adults for up to 6 months. These findings provide valuable insights into pre-vaccination and post-vaccination responses to residual NA, which can guide future vaccine development strategies. Enhanced understanding of NA immunogenicity should inform public health approaches to improve global influenza prevention and control.

Keywords: immunogenicity; influenza; neuraminidase; neutralizing antibodies; seasonal vaccine.

 
Back
Top Bottom