• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Influenza Other Respir Viruses . Comparison of influenza viral load in nasopharyngeal and midturbinate swabs

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Influenza Other Respir Viruses


. 2024 Jan 21;18(1):e13253.
doi: 10.1111/irv.13253. eCollection 2024 Jan. Comparison of influenza viral load in nasopharyngeal and midturbinate swabs

Corrado Bernasconi[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Laurie Katugampola[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Steffen Wildum[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Different specimen types are used for influenza diagnosis but comparative data for viral loads from different swab types are limited. We compared influenza viral loads (determined by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR]) in 93 paired midturbinate and nasopharyngeal swab aliquots from influenza infected patients enrolled in a phase 3 randomized-controlled study with the objective of maximizing the number of swabs available for sequence analysis. Midturbinate swabs yielded a 53% lower viral load versus nasopharyngeal swabs, and this difference was similar for influenza A and B. These data suggest that nasopharyngeal swabs might be preferred in diagnostic settings when obtaining higher viral load is important.

Keywords: CENTERSTONE; influenza virus; midturbinate swab; nasopharyngeal swab; specimen type; viral load.

 
Back
Top