• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Infect Dis Ther . Superior Effectiveness and Estimated Public Health Impact of Cell- Versus Egg-Based Influenza Vaccines in Children and Adults Duri

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Infect Dis Ther


. 2025 Oct 3.
doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01230-2. Online ahead of print. Superior Effectiveness and Estimated Public Health Impact of Cell- Versus Egg-Based Influenza Vaccines in Children and Adults During the US 2023-2024 Season

Alicia N Stein[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anusorn Thanataveerat[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kimberly McDermott[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Alex Dean[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Stephanie Wall[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Cory Pack[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ian McGovern[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Sheena G Sullivan[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Mendel Haag[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of cell-based versus egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVc versus QIVe) in preventing test-confirmed influenza during the 2023-2024 US influenza season.
Methods: rVE was estimated using a test-negative design applied to a large, linked, real-world dataset. QIVc or QIVe recipients aged 6 months-64 years who were tested for influenza within ± 7 days of an acute respiratory or febrile illness were included. rVE was estimated using doubly robust logistic regression. Analyses were performed for the full, pediatric, adult, outpatient and high-risk populations and by influenza type. Public health impact was assessed using a compartmental influenza burden averted model.
Results: The analysis included 2119 QIVc-cases, 14,750 QIVc-controls, 14,559 QIVe-cases, and 75,351 QIVe-controls. QIVc was superior to QIVe in preventing test-confirmed influenza with an rVE of 19.8% (95% CI 15.7-23.8%) in the full population, and with rVEs of 19.6% (13.6-25.3%) in the pediatric population aged 6 months-17 years and 18.5% (12.1-24.5%) in adults aged 18-64 years. Consistent results were observed for all sensitivity and subgroup analyses against any influenza. If all vaccinated individuals aged 6 months-64 years in the US received QIVc over QIVe, an estimated 2,379,395 additional symptomatic illnesses would have been prevented, with proportionate reductions in related complications.
Conclusions: Our analysis showed superior effectiveness of QIVc over QIVe in preventing test-confirmed influenza among persons aged 6 months-64 years, and provided the first demonstration of superiority in pediatric populations from 6 months of age. A Graphical Abstract is availible for this article.

Keywords: Burden; Burden averted; Cell-based influenza vaccine; Egg adaptation; Influenza; Influenza virus mismatch; Relative vaccine effectiveness.

 
Back
Top Bottom