• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Immunogenicity and safety of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent inactivated split vaccine in Korea

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2010 Nov 2. [Epub ahead of print]
Immunogenicity and safety of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent inactivated split vaccine in Korea.

Cheong HJ, Song JY, Heo JY, Noh JY, Choi WS, Park DW, Wie SH, Kim WJ.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract

In a pandemic, the development of an effective influenza vaccine is the most important subject from the view of public health. This study was performed to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of inactivated, monovalent H1N1 2009 vaccine (Green Cross Corporation, Yongin, Korea) among healthy adults aged 19-64 years (Group 1) and the elderly aged ≥65 years (Group 2) in a two-dose regimen, 21 days apart. At baseline, 28 of 454 participants (6.1%) had hemagglutination-inhibition titers of ≥1:40 with no significant difference between age groups (p=0.27). There was an apparent dose-dependent antibody response; participants receiving the dose of 30μg hemagglutinin (HA) showed higher geometric mean titers (GMTs) than the 15μg HA group in both age groups. Despite the rates of seroprotection and seroconversion were significantly higher with 30μg HA formulation than 15μg HA formula in Group 2, there was no definite difference in Group 1 irrespective of vaccine formula. Significant GMT elevation after the second dose was not noted in either age group, regardless vaccine formulations. No deaths, vaccine-related serious adverse events, or immediate unsolicited adverse reactions occurred during the study periods.
Copyright ? 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

PMID: 21055502 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21055502
 
Back
Top Bottom