• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

HRB Open Res . Investigating and evaluating evidence of the behavioural determinants of adherence to social distancing measures - A protocol for a

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
HRB Open Res


. 2020 Jul 21;3:46.
doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13099.1. eCollection 2020.
Investigating and evaluating evidence of the behavioural determinants of adherence to social distancing measures - A protocol for a scoping review of COVID-19 research


Chris Noone[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nikolett Warner[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Molly Byrne[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hannah Durand[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kim L Lavoie[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Brian E McGuire[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jenny Mc Sharry[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Oonagh Meade[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Eimear Morrissey[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Gerry Molloy[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Laura O'Connor[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elaine Toomey[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: The WHO has declared the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a pandemic. With no vaccine currently available, using behavioural measures to reduce the spread of the virus within the population is an important tool in mitigating the effects of this pandemic. As such, social distancing measures are being implemented globally and have proven an effective tool in slowing the large-scale spread of the virus. Aim: This scoping review will focus on answering key questions about the state of the evidence on the behavioural determinants of adherence to social distancing measures in research on COVID-19. Methods: A scoping review will be conducted in accordance with guidelines for best practice. Literature searches will be conducted using online databases and grey literature sources. Databases will include Medline, Web of Science, Embase and PsycInfo, alongside relevant pre-print servers. Grey literature will be searched on Google Scholar. Screening, data extraction and quality appraisal will be conducted independently by two members of the research team, with any discrepancies resolved by consensus discussion and an additional team member if needed. Quality appraisal will be conducted using the Cochrane's ROBINS-I tool, the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist where appropriate. Results will be analysed by mapping findings onto the Theoretical Domains Framework and visualising characteristics of the included studies using EviAtlas. This scoping review is pre-registered with Open Science Framework. Conclusions The results of this study may facilitate the systematic development of behavioural interventions to increase adherence to social distancing measures.

Keywords: COVID-19; coronavirus; pandemic; physical distancing; social distancing.
 
Back
Top Bottom