• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Health Policy Technol . COVID-19 misinformation: Accuracy of articles about coronavirus prevention mostly shared on social media

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Health Policy Technol


. 2020 Nov 1.
doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.10.007. Online ahead of print.
COVID-19 misinformation: Accuracy of articles about coronavirus prevention mostly shared on social media


Justyna Obiała[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Karolina Obiała[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Małgorzata Mańczak[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jakub Owoc[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Robert Olszewski[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: To analyze accuracy of articles about COVID-19 prevention most frequently shared through social media platforms.
Methods: Identifying, using the Buzzsumo analytic tool, 30 most frequently shared articles in April 2020 about COVID-19 prevention and classifying them according to number of shares, accuracy, topic and sharing platform. Calculations were made using descriptive statistics tools and chi-square test.
Results: The top 30 articles about coronavirus prevention were shared 4904 160 times over a period of one month with 96.8% of all shares through Facebook. Most of the articles (80%) was found to be accurate, however they accounted for only 64% of shares. The inaccuracies referred mostly to handwashing. The most shared articles were about medications followed by masks and hand washing.
Conclusions: Articles about coronavirus prevention are usually accurate, yet relatively less likely to be shared than inaccurate ones. Facebook remains a dominant social media platform for sharing content. Buzzsumo could be considered a tool in certain situations such as pandemic for health authorities to quickly investigate different health topics popular on social media.
Lay summary: Most of the articles about COVID-19 prevention, identified as most frequently shared through social media platform during the pandemic, was found to be accurate. However, inaccurate content was more likely to be shared than by Facebook users compared with accurate content. This suggests the need for health authorities to monitor content shared on social media in extraordinary situations such as pandemics.

Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; Misinformation; Public health; Social media.
 
Back
Top Bottom