Re: Google to limit free news access
Tropical I love that it is free to the end user too but it is not free to provide water or gather and distribute news. It may be that governments think it is worth informing their populations so they can make informed decisions - enough of them work hard in the other direction - they may also decide water is a basic right and should be provided free to the user. In each case someone is paying for water treatment and distribution or news gathering and dissemination. I am not sure I want governments funding news, as I do not think many of them could resist some level of editorial control. In my country if you want to watch TV - even if you only watch commercial channels - you have to buy a TV license (about 160euros/year/household) this is used to fund the BBC which provides 4 National TV channels (+ local programing), 5 national radio stations (+local) and online news. The BBC's charter guarantees editorial independence which the corporation and public take very seriously.
Tropical I love that it is free to the end user too but it is not free to provide water or gather and distribute news. It may be that governments think it is worth informing their populations so they can make informed decisions - enough of them work hard in the other direction - they may also decide water is a basic right and should be provided free to the user. In each case someone is paying for water treatment and distribution or news gathering and dissemination. I am not sure I want governments funding news, as I do not think many of them could resist some level of editorial control. In my country if you want to watch TV - even if you only watch commercial channels - you have to buy a TV license (about 160euros/year/household) this is used to fund the BBC which provides 4 National TV channels (+ local programing), 5 national radio stations (+local) and online news. The BBC's charter guarantees editorial independence which the corporation and public take very seriously.