• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

"Google flu trends" and emergency department triage data predicted the 2009 pandemic H1N1 waves in Manitoba

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Can J Public Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;102(4):294-7.
"Google flu trends" and emergency department triage data predicted the 2009 pandemic H1N1 waves in Manitoba.
Malik MT, Gumel A, Thompson LH, Strome T, Mahmud SM.
Source

Department of Mathematics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:

We assessed the performance of syndromic indicators based on Google Flu Trends (GFT) and emergency department (ED) data for the early detection and monitoring of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic waves in Manitoba.
METHODS:

Time-series curves for the weekly counts of laboratory-confirmed H1N1 cases in Manitoba during the 2009 pandemic were plotted against the three syndromic indicators: 1) GFT data, based on flu-related Internet search queries, 2) weekly count of all ED visits triaged as influenza-like illness (ED ILI volume), and 3) percentage of all ED visits that were triaged as an ILI (ED ILI percent). A linear regression model was fitted separately for each indicator and correlations with weekly virologic data were calculated for different lag periods for each pandemic wave.
RESULTS:

All three indicators peaked 1-2 weeks earlier than the epidemic curve of laboratory-confirmed cases. For GFT data, the best-fitting model had about a 2-week lag period in relation to the epidemic curve. Similarly, the best-fitting models for both ED indicators were observed for a time lag of 1-2 weeks. All three indicators performed better as predictors of the virologic time trends during the second wave as compared to the first. There was strong congruence between the time series of the GFT and both the ED ILI volume and the ED ILI percent indicators.
CONCLUSION:

During an influenza season characterized by high levels of disease activity, GFT and ED indicators provided a good indication of weekly counts of laboratory-confirmed influenza cases in Manitoba 1-2 weeks in advance.

PMID:
21913587
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21913587
 
Re: "Google flu trends" and emergency department triage data predicted the 2009 pandemic H1N1 waves in Manitoba

The title of this article, ?Google flu trends" and emergency department triage data predicted the 2009 pandemic H1N1 waves in Manitoba? seems to be overly ambitious. This study, published in 2011, only shows that increases in flu term searches from Google Flu Trends (GFT) and emergency department (ED) triage for ILI correlated with increases in H1N1 influenza cases in 2009.

This correlation of GFT and ED triage data with the 2009 H1N1 waves in Manitoba was only retrospectively discovered and published two years after the outbreak. While these data are certainly correlated with the outbreak, they didn?t ?predict? the waves before they occurred in 2009. If increases in GFT and ILI visits from EDs accurately predicted increases in H1N1 cases in Manitoba in 2009, with a two week lead time, why weren?t the public health official notified at the time to assist then in preparing for the increases in cases to follow two weeks later?
 
Back
Top Bottom