tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Vet Sci
. 2025 Jul 3:12:1582269.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1582269. eCollection 2025. Evaluation of risk-based antigen and antibody surveillance strategies and their association with HPAI outbreaks in South Korean duck farms
Saleem Ahmad[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dae Sung Yoo[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Introduction: Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) continues to threaten the poultry industry, particularly in duck farms, where early detection is critical to preventing widespread outbreaks. In South Korea, risk-based antigen and antibody surveillance strategies have been implemented to enhance early warning capabilities. However, the effectiveness of these strategies-especially in terms of testing frequency, timing, and spatial alignment with outbreak risks-remains under-evaluated.
Methods: This study analyzed antigen and antibody surveillance data from South Korean duck farms between 2019 and 2022. Testing frequencies and intervals were assessed across high-risk (October-May) and low-risk (June-September) periods, as well as during non-epidemic (2019-2020) and epidemic (2020-2021 and 2021-2022) seasons. Spatial hotspot analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*) and negative binomial regression were applied to evaluate associations between test patterns and HPAI outbreak occurrence. Additionally, test-to-outbreak intervals were calculated to assess the timeliness of detection.
Results: Antigen testing frequencies were significantly associated with HPAI outbreaks during high-risk periods (coefficient = 0.56, IRR = 1.75, p < 0.001). Hot-spot analysis revealed that cold spots received disproportionately more antigen testing than outbreak hotspots (p < 0.001), indicating a misalignment in surveillance priorities. Despite intensified testing during epidemic seasons, no significant reductions were observed in the time intervals between the last diagnostic test and outbreak onset (p > 0.05), suggesting limited improvement in early detection.
Discussion: The findings highlight both the strengths and limitations of South Korea's current HPAI surveillance strategy in duck farms. While antigen testing serves as a useful predictor of outbreak risk, the spatial and temporal mismatch between surveillance intensity and actual outbreak distribution undermines its effectiveness. A more adaptive and geographically targeted testing approach is needed to enhance outbreak preparedness and response. These results provide a foundation for optimizing future surveillance strategies to minimize the economic and public health impacts of HPAI.
Keywords: antibody; antigen; avian influenza; hot spots; outbreaks; poultry; surveillance.
. 2025 Jul 3:12:1582269.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1582269. eCollection 2025. Evaluation of risk-based antigen and antibody surveillance strategies and their association with HPAI outbreaks in South Korean duck farms
Saleem Ahmad[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dae Sung Yoo[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 40678492
- PMCID: PMC12268706
- DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1582269
Introduction: Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) continues to threaten the poultry industry, particularly in duck farms, where early detection is critical to preventing widespread outbreaks. In South Korea, risk-based antigen and antibody surveillance strategies have been implemented to enhance early warning capabilities. However, the effectiveness of these strategies-especially in terms of testing frequency, timing, and spatial alignment with outbreak risks-remains under-evaluated.
Methods: This study analyzed antigen and antibody surveillance data from South Korean duck farms between 2019 and 2022. Testing frequencies and intervals were assessed across high-risk (October-May) and low-risk (June-September) periods, as well as during non-epidemic (2019-2020) and epidemic (2020-2021 and 2021-2022) seasons. Spatial hotspot analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*) and negative binomial regression were applied to evaluate associations between test patterns and HPAI outbreak occurrence. Additionally, test-to-outbreak intervals were calculated to assess the timeliness of detection.
Results: Antigen testing frequencies were significantly associated with HPAI outbreaks during high-risk periods (coefficient = 0.56, IRR = 1.75, p < 0.001). Hot-spot analysis revealed that cold spots received disproportionately more antigen testing than outbreak hotspots (p < 0.001), indicating a misalignment in surveillance priorities. Despite intensified testing during epidemic seasons, no significant reductions were observed in the time intervals between the last diagnostic test and outbreak onset (p > 0.05), suggesting limited improvement in early detection.
Discussion: The findings highlight both the strengths and limitations of South Korea's current HPAI surveillance strategy in duck farms. While antigen testing serves as a useful predictor of outbreak risk, the spatial and temporal mismatch between surveillance intensity and actual outbreak distribution undermines its effectiveness. A more adaptive and geographically targeted testing approach is needed to enhance outbreak preparedness and response. These results provide a foundation for optimizing future surveillance strategies to minimize the economic and public health impacts of HPAI.
Keywords: antibody; antigen; avian influenza; hot spots; outbreaks; poultry; surveillance.