• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Front Immunol . The Mucosal and Serological Immune Responses to the Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Vaccines

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Immunol


. 2021 Oct 12;12:744887.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.744887. eCollection 2021.
The Mucosal and Serological Immune Responses to the Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Vaccines


Renee W Y Chan[SUP] 1 2 3 4 [/SUP], Shaojun Liu[SUP] 1 2 3 4 [/SUP], Jonathan Y Cheung[SUP] 1 2 3 4 [/SUP], Joseph G S Tsun[SUP] 1 2 3 4 [/SUP], Kate C Chan[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Kathy Y Y Chan[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Genevieve P G Fung[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Albert M Li[SUP] 1 2 4 [/SUP], Hugh Simon Lam[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Although the serological antibody responses induced by SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are well characterized, little is known about their ability to elicit mucosal immunity.
Objectives: This study aims to examine and compare the mucosal and systemic responses of recipients of two different vaccination platforms: mRNA (Comirnaty) and inactivated virus (CoronaVac).
Methods: Serial blood and nasal epithelial lining fluid (NELF) samples were collected from the recipients of either Comirnaty or CoronaVac. The plasma and NELF immunoglobulins A and G (IgA and IgG) specific to SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein (S1) and their neutralization effects were quantified.
Results: Comirnaty induced nasal S1-specific immunoglobulin responses, which were evident as early as 14 ± 2 days after the first dose. In 64% of the subjects, the neutralizing effects of NELF persisted for at least 50 days. Moreover, 85% of Comirnaty recipients exhibited S1-specific IgA and IgG responses in plasma by 14 ± 2 days after the first dose. By 7 ± 2 days after the booster, all plasma samples possessed S1-specific IgA and IgG responses and were neutralizing. The induction of S1-specific plasma antibodies by CoronaVac was IgG dominant, and 83% of the subjects possessed S1-specific IgG by 7 ± 2 days after the booster, with neutralizing effects.
Conclusion: Comirnaty induces S1-specific IgA and IgG responses with neutralizing activity in the nasal mucosa; a similar response is not seen with CoronaVac.
Clinical implication: The presence of a nasal response with mRNA vaccine may provide additional protection compared with inactivated virus vaccine. However, whether such widespread immunological response may produce inadvertent adverse effects in other tissues warrants further investigation.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; immunoglobulin A; immunoglobulin G; inactivated virus vaccine; mRNA vaccine; mucosal immunity; nasal epithelial lining fluid; serological immunity.
 
Back
Top Bottom