• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Front Immunol . Tetravalent Influenza Vaccine Is Not Associated With Neuroaxonal Damage in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Immunol


. 2021 Aug 26;12:718895.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.718895. eCollection 2021.
Tetravalent Influenza Vaccine Is Not Associated With Neuroaxonal Damage in Multiple Sclerosis Patients


Tobias Moser[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michael Seiberl[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Julia Feige[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lara Bieler[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Richard F Radlberger[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ciara O'Sullivan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Georg Pilz[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrea Harrer[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kerstin Schwenker[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elisabeth Haschke-Becher[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Lukas Machegger[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jochen Grimm[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Monika Redlberger-Fritz[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Arabella Buchmann[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Michael Khalil[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Erich Kvas[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Eugen Trinka[SUP] 1 7 [/SUP], Peter Wipfler[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Efficacy of vaccines and disease activity linked to immunization are major concerns among people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS).
Objective: To assess antibody responses to seasonal influenza antigens and vaccine-associated neuroaxonal damage utilizing serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) in pwMS receiving dimethyl fumarate (DMF).
Methods: In this prospective study, the 2020/2021 seasonal tetravalent influenza vaccine was administered to 20 pwMS treated with DMF and 15 healthy controls (HCs). The primary endpoints were responder rate of strain-specific antibody production (seroconversion or significant (4-fold) increase in influenza-antibody titers for ≥2/4 strains) at 30 days post-vaccination and changes in sNfL levels.
Results: All patients treated with DMF fulfilled the responder criteria for immunization compared with 53% of the controls. However, higher proportions of HCs already had influenza-antibody titers ≥1:40 at baseline (53% vs. 41%, p = 0.174). sNfL levels were comparable among both groups at baseline and did not increase 34 days after vaccination. In addition, no clinical or radiological disease reactivation was found.
Conclusion: DMF-treated patients mount an adequate humoral immune response to influenza vaccines. Within the limits of the small cohort investigated, our data suggest that influenza immunization is not associated with clinical or subclinical disease reactivation.

Keywords: COVID-19; NfL; antibody response; immunization; influenza; titers; vaccination.
 
Back
Top Bottom