• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Front Immunol . Exploring the standardized detection and sampling methods of human nasal SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgA

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Immunol


. 2025 May 20:16:1571418.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1571418. eCollection 2025. Exploring the standardized detection and sampling methods of human nasal SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgA

Xuanxuan Zhang[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Jizong Jia[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 3 [/SUP], Chaoying Hu[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Yulong Fu[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Guanxing Liu[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Yajing Li[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Qian He[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Fan Gao[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Na Li[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Lina Wang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jianping Chu[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Henggang Xu[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Zhihao Fu[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Hui Zhao[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Zhenglun Liang[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Jingxin Li[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Miao Xu[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Qunying Mao[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Introduction: Vaccines capable of effectively inducing mucosal immunity, particularly specific IgA antibodies, represent an ideal strategy for preventing infections and the transmission of pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses that rapidly replicate in the upper respiratory tract and cause clinical symptoms. However, a lack of standardized nasal antibody detection and sampling methods has hindered cross-study comparability and vaccine development.
Methods: This study uses SARS-CoV-2 as a model pathogen to standardize nasal antibody detection methods and sampling methods. Following the scientific guidelines (Q14 and Q2(R2)) for analytical procedure development and validation released by the International Council for Harmonization (ICH), an ELISA for nasal SARS-CoV-2 WT-RBD specific IgA detection was established and validated. To compare the sampling methods, nasal samples were collected from five groups using three commonly used nasal sampling methods (M1: nasopharyngeal swab; M2: nasal swab; M3: expanding sponge method). The total IgA and SARS-CoV-2 WT-RBD IgA in clinical samples were detected.
Results: The first validated ELISA for nasal SARS-CoV-2 WT-RBD specific IgA detection was established through analytical target profiling (ATP), risk assessment, and design of experiment optimization. Systematic validation demonstrated exclusive specificity for the target antigen, with intermediate precision of <17% and relative bias of <±4%, meeting ATP requirements. Analysis of 154 clinical samples demonstrated strong concordance between the novel method and electrochemiluminescence assays, with a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.87 for quantitative results and a kappa coefficient of 0.85 for results above and below the dilution-adjusted limit of quantification (LOQ). Applying this novel method, a clinical comparison revealed that M3 achieved superior performance in terms of the single-day detection rate (above dilution-adjusted LOQ 95.5%), 5-day consecutive detection rate (above dilution-adjusted LOQ 88.9%), and median SARS-CoV-2 WT-RBD IgA concentration (171.2 U/mL), significantly outperforming M1 (68.8%; 48.7%; 28.7 U/mL, p<0.0001) and M2 (88.3%; 77.3%; 93.7 U/mL, p<0.05).
Conclusion: This study has established the first standardized nasal detection system. The system can be adapted with appropriate modifications for the clinical evaluation of other respiratory mucosal vaccines, thereby advancing the development of mucosal vaccines.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; binding activity; immune assay; nasal antibody; nasal sample collection.

 
Back
Top Bottom