• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Fever screening of seasonal influenza patients using a cost-effective thermopile array with small pixels for close-range thermometry

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Infect Dis. 2014 May 20. pii: S1201-9712(14)01495-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.03.1398. [Epub ahead of print]
Fever screening of seasonal influenza patients using a cost-effective thermopile array with small pixels for close-range thermometry.
Sun G1, Saga T2, Shimizu T2, Hakozaki Y3, Matsui T4.
Author information
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:

Infrared thermography systems have been used for fever screening at many airports since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003. However, many of these systems are expensive and non-portable. Therefore, we developed a cost-effective and compact (2.9 ? 5.8 ? 2.0cm) thermopile array for fever screening of patients with infectious diseases in the clinical setting.
METHODS:

The array was created with small pixels (48 ? 47 = 2256 pixels) fabricated on a silicon wafer using microelectromechanical systems technology. We tested this array on 155 febrile and afebrile patients (35.4?C ≤ axillary temperature ≤ 39.3?C) with seasonal influenza at the Japan Self-Defense Forces Central Hospital.
RESULTS:

The maximum facial temperature, measured by the array at 0.3 m from the subject, exhibited a positive correlation with axillary temperature measured using a contact-type thermometer (r = 0.71, p < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of the thermopile array in identifying the febrile subjects were 80.5% and 93.3%, respectively, setting the threshold cut-off of maximum facial temperature at an appropriate value.
CONCLUSIONS:

Our cost-effective thermopile array appears promising for future close-range fever screening of patients with infectious diseases at primary care doctor clinics, health care centers, and quarantine stations in developing and developed countries.

Copyright ? 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
KEYWORDS:

Fever screening, Human facial temperature, Infection control, Thermography

PMID:
24858901
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24858901
 
Back
Top Bottom