• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Exposure to most poisonous gasses protected American munitions workers from the 1918 pandemic flu

Emily

Editor, Senior Moderator
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/715242_3

The effects of poison gas on munitions workers' health

By 1918 the use of poison gas, first introduced in 1915, was routine when bombarding enemy trenches. A great number of workers were assigned by the Ministry of Munitions to produce shells filled with the noxious substances. Numerous BMJ authors remark on the apparent protection afforded by all types of gas production except phosgene ( Table 1 ).
Dr Gregor, writing in 1919, informs us that it was apparently "custom to take children suffering from whooping cough to the nearest gasworks and expose them to the fumes emanating from the oxide of the iron purifiers during the process of cleansing, and the parents of these children firmly believe that by doing so the attack is much mitigated".<sup>[14]</sup> He goes on to report a comparative cohort analysis of the incidence of influenza in populations with different exposure levels to gases ( Table 2 ). Assuming that uniformed personnel were the fittest population, the difference in incidence is striking.
 
Back
Top