• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Evaluating influenza vaccination campaigns beyond coverage: A before-after study among health care workers

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Aug;41(8):674-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.04.006.
Evaluating influenza vaccination campaigns beyond coverage: A before-after study among health care workers.
Llupi? A, Mena G, Oliv? V, Quesada S, Aldea M, Sequera VG, R?os J, Garc?a-Basteiro AL, Varela P, Bayas JM, Trilla A.
Source

Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology Unit, Hospital Cl?nic-Universitat de Barcelona-Barcelona Centre for International Health Research (CRESIB), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Electronic address: allupia@clinic.ub.es.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

Influenza vaccination campaigns based on educational interventions do not seem to increase coverage in the hospital setting, and their impact on educational goals is not usually evaluated. This study describes the campaign implemented in a university hospital and assesses the achievement of the strategic objectives, which were to increase health care workers (HCW) perceptions of the risk of influenza and of their role as promoters of influenza vaccination among their colleagues and to increase knowledge about influenza.
METHODS:

A before-after study was conducted using a self-administered survey in a randomized sample of HCW during the 2010-2011 influenza vaccination campaign. The Wilcoxon paired measures test was used to assess attainment of the strategic objectives.
RESULTS:

The campaign had a positive impact on the strategic objectives (Wilcoxon test, P value <.05 in all cases). The reach of the campaign was high (91.9%), and HCW rated it as positive (7.19 [standard deviation, 2.3] out of 10) but did not achieve increased coverage (34%; 95% confidence interval: 33.8-36.4).
CONCLUSION:

Evaluation of the campaign shows that its effect responded to the strategic objectives. However, it seems that increasing the information provided to HCW and heightening their risk perception do not necessarily lead to greater acceptance of influenza vaccination.

Copyright ? 2013 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
KEYWORDS:

Health promotion, Hospital, Occupational health, Risk acceptability, Risk perception

PMID:
23896285
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23896285
 
Back
Top Bottom