• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

European influenza laboratories check their performance in antiviral susceptibility testing (ECDC, November 14 2012)

Giuseppe

Emeritus
[Source: The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), full page: (LINK).]

European influenza laboratories check their performance in antiviral susceptibility testing

14 Nov 2012 / ECDC



The new ECDC technical report describes the first European external quality assessment (EQA) exercise for antiviral drug susceptibility testing of influenza viruses.

Twenty different laboratories from 16 European countries participated in the exercise carried out during winter 2010/11.

Participants tested samples of recent influenza A and B viruses containing substitutions known to confer resistance to antiviral drugs. In addition, they provided an interpretation of variations in the results for genotypic and phenotypic testing in terms of virus susceptibility to antiviral drugs.

The results of the exercise show good results from the genotypic detection of the H275Y mutation in influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus. The proficiency for detection of a mixture of resistant and sensitive A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses was lower.

Areas of difficulty included influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 mixture analysis, analysis of NAI-resistant H3N2 and influenza B virus.

Variation between genotypic and phenotypic susceptibility testing was observed.

The report concludes that the following strategies would help to improve consistency:
  • provision of guidelines on the interpretation of resistance mutations and phenotyping results;
  • harmonisation of baseline values;
  • provision of a reference set of viruses.
Future capacity building should focus on the development of widespread capability for genotypic and phenotypic detection of oseltamivir resistance in A(H1N1)pdm09 and other human influenza viruses.

The results of this exercise will be used to guide the development of the network of laboratories and promote harmonisation of antiviral susceptibility testing, data interpretation and reporting.

- ------
 
Back
Top