• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Eur J Med Res . Retrospective study on the efficacy of monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a screening test for COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Eur J Med Res


. 2023 Mar 27;28(1):136.
doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01086-7.
Retrospective study on the efficacy of monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a screening test for COVID-19


Kentaro Wakamatsu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zenzo Nagasawa[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kouta Katsuki[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Hiroyuki Kumazoe[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Masayo Yasuda[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Sae Kawamoto[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ayano Kawamura[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Tsuyoshi Ueno[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ruriko Kiyotani[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Izumi Fukui[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Sanae Maki[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Nobuhiko Nagata[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Masayuki Kawasaki[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Hozumi Yamada[SUP] 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Pathogenic genetic testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can detect viruses with high sensitivity; however, there are several challenges. In the prevention, testing, and treatment of COVID-19, more effective, safer, and convenient methods are desired. We evaluated the possibility of monocyte distribution width (MDW) as an infection biomarker in COVID-19 testing.
Methods: The efficacy of MDW as a screening test for COVID-19 was retrospectively assessed in 80 patients in the COVID-19 group and 232 patients in the non-COVID-19 group (141 patients with acute respiratory infection, 19 patients with nonrespiratory infection, one patient with a viral infection, 11 patients who had received treatment for COVID-19, one patient in contact with COVID-19 patients, and 59 patients with noninfectious disease).
Results: The median MDW in 80 patients in the COVID-19 group was 23.3 (17.2-33.6), and the median MDW in 232 patients in the non-COVID-19 group was 19.0 (13.6-30.2) (P < 0.001). When the COVID-19 group was identified using the MDW cut-off value of 21.3 from the non-COVID-19 group, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.844, and the sensitivity and specificity were 81.3% and 78.2%, respectively. Comparison of MDW by severity between the COVID-19 group and patients with acute respiratory infection in the non-COVID-19 group showed that MDW was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group for all mild, moderate I, and moderate II disease.
Conclusions: MDW (cut-off value: 21.3) may be used as a screening test for COVID-19 in fever outpatients. Trial registration This study was conducted after being approved by the ethics committee of National Hospital Organization Omuta National Hospital (Approval No. 3-19). This study can be accessed via https://omuta.hosp.go.jp/files/000179721.pdf .

Keywords: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); DxH 900; Monocyte; Monocyte distribution width (MDW); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
 
Back
Top Bottom