• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Eur Heart J Open . Relative vaccine effectiveness of high-dose vs. standard-dose influenza vaccine against clinical outcomes according to history o

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Eur Heart J Open


. 2025 Aug 21;5(5):oeaf102.
doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf102. eCollection 2025 Sep. Relative vaccine effectiveness of high-dose vs. standard-dose influenza vaccine against clinical outcomes according to history of atrial fibrillation: a pre-specified analysis of the DANFLU-1 randomized trial

Caroline Espersen[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Niklas Dyrby Johansen[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Daniel Modin[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Kira Hyldekær Janstrup[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Matthew M Loiacono[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Rebecca C Harris[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Tor Biering-Sørensen[SUP] 1 2 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) may be associated with adverse influenza-related outcomes. We assessed the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) vs. standard-dose (SD-IIV) inactivated influenza vaccination against cardiovascular and all-cause hospitalizations and all-cause mortality according to history of AF.
Methods and results: This was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-1, a pragmatic, open-label, feasibility trial randomizing adults aged 65-79 years 1:1 to HD-IIV or SD-IIV during the 2021-2022 influenza season in Denmark. Baseline and endpoint data were obtained from the nationwide administrative health registries. Prespecified endpoints included cardiovascular hospitalizations and all-cause mortality occurring 14 days after vaccination until 31 May 2022. Among 12 477 randomized participants, 878 (7.0%) had AF at baseline. Participants with AF were older (73.0 ± 3.8 vs. 71.7 ± 3.9 years, P < 0.001), more likely to be male (70.7% vs. 51.5%, P < 0.001) and have concomitant comorbidities. The incidence rate of hospitalization for AF was 75.5 vs. 5.1 per 1000 person-years for individuals with vs. without AF (P < 0.001). HD-IIV vs. SD-IIV was associated with a lower all-cause mortality rate irrespective of AF status (AF: 9 events, rVE 54.1%, 95% CI -114.7 to 92.6% vs. no AF: 53 events, rVE 48.3%, 95% CI 6.3-72.5%, pinteraction = 0.87). HD-IIV was not associated with a lower incidence of AF hospitalization regardless of AF status (overall rVE: 29.7%, 95% CI -13.9 to 57.1, pinteraction = 0.51).
Conclusion: Although DANFLU-1 was not powered for clinical endpoints, HD-IIV vs. SD-IIV was associated with lower all-cause mortality irrespective of AF status. HD-IIV compared with SD-IIV was not associated with a significantly lower incidence of AF hospitalizations regardless of AF status.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Hospitalization; Influenza; Influenza vaccine; Mortality.

 
Back
Top Bottom