• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

ESBL in 11% of E-Coli isolates in Europe

Gert van der Hoek

In Memoriam - Editor, Senior Moderator
Ertapenem resistance still very low.

ESBL in 11% of E-Coli isolates in Europe

Susceptibility of European Escherichia coli Clinical Isolates from Intra-Abdominal Infections, ESBL-Occurrence, Resistance Distribution, and Molecular Characterization of Ertapenem Resistant Isolates (SMART 2008-2009)

Abstract

A total of 3,160 clinical isolates of Escherichia coli from intra-abdominal infections were collected during 2008 ? 2009 from 13 European countries. The rate of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing isolates in Europe was 11%.

The most active antibiotics tested were typically imipenem, ertapenem, and amikacin, though the activity of all non-carbapenem antibiotics was lower when tested against ESBL-positive isolates as compared with ESBL-negative isolates. Ertapenem exhibited 99.4% susceptibility with all isolates, and 96.8% with ESBL-positive isolates.

Applying the ertapenem CLSI clinical breakpoint for resistance (MIC ≥1 μg/ml), only 5 isolates (0.2%) were ertapenem-resistant, of which only three were available for molecular characterization. Of those three, only one was ESBL-positive (CTX-M-14), and two were carbapenemase-positive (OXA-48). All three were negative for, VIM, NDM and KPC carbapenemases.

Although ertapenem-resistance in E. coli is very low, further monitoring of ertapenem susceptibility and molecular characterization of ertapenem-resistant isolates is needed.

Clinical Microbiology and Infection
 
Back
Top Bottom