• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Engaging the normative question in the H5N1 avian influenza mutation experiments

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2013 Sep 5;8(1):12. [Epub ahead of print]
Engaging the normative question in the H5N1 avian influenza mutation experiments.
Swazo NK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:

In recent time there has been ample discussion concerning censorship of research conducted in two labs involved in avian influenza virus research. Much of the debate has centered on the question whether the methods and results should reach to open disclosure given the "dual use" nature of this research which can be used for nefarious purposes.
METHODS:

This paper reviews the discussion to date but centers on epistemological issues associated with initial justification of this research and what this entails for continuation of this research despite US governmental biosecurity concerns. The question here is whether there was reasonable moral warrant for genetic alteration of the H5N1 influenza virus.
CONCLUSION:

The paper concludes with philosophical (ethical) justification for continuation of this research.

PMID:
24006905
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
PMCID:
PMC3766690

Free PMC Article

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24006905
 
Back
Top Bottom