• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Defective Interfering Virus Protects Elderly Mice from Influenza

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Defective Interfering Virus Protects Elderly Mice from Influenza

Paul D Scott, Bo Meng, Anthony C Marriott, Andrew J Easton and Nigel J Dimmock

For all author emails, please log on.

Virology Journal 2011, 8:212 doi:10.1186/1743-422X-8-212
Published: 9 May 2011
Abstract (provisional)
Background

We have identified and characterised a defective-interfering (DI) influenza A virus particles containing a highly deleted segment 1 RNA that has broad-spectrum antiviral activity. In young adult mice it exerts protection against several different subtypes of influenza A virus (defined here as homologous or genetically compatible protection) and against a paramyxovirus and an influenza B virus (heterologous or genetically unrelated protection). Homologous protection is mediated by replication competition between the deleted and full-length genomes, and heterologous protection occurs through stimulation of innate immunity, especially interferon type I.
Methods

A single dose of the protective DI virus was administered intranasally to elderly mice at -7, -1 and +1 days prior to intranasal challenge with influenza A virus.
Results

A single dose of the DI virus given 1 or 7 days protected elderly mice, reducing a severe, sometimes fatal disease to a subclinical or mild infection. In contrast, all members of control groups treated with inactivated DI virus before challenge became extremely ill and most died. Despite the subclinical/mild nature of their infection, protected mice developed solid immunity to a second infectious challenge.
Conclusions

The defective interfering virus is effective in preventing severe influenza A in elderly mice and may offer a new approach to protection of the human population.

http://www.virologyj.com/content/pdf/1743-422X-8-212.pdf
 
Re: Defective Interfering Virus Protects Elderly Mice from Influenza

> highly deleted segment 1 RNA

why not segment 4

in theory
we could make a virus that is fully functional and does replicate
and thus compete with other (flu) viruses
but only causes mild disease and maybe doesn't spread
to other hosts


or a slowly replicating flu, so slow that immunity is fast
enough to stop it

or we just inject it into cells,organs where it can't escape
but still replicate and causes no damage

or just connect the blood-stream to a flu cell culture
outside the body
viruses presumably won't survive in blood
would it collect antibody-data and produce B-cell immunity ?
just speculating,


the LAIV does it ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_attenuated_influenza_vaccine
 
Back
Top Bottom