• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Decontamination of patients' apartments

Re: Decontamination of patients' apartments

Thank you Lizw. Interesting article. According to article Ebola viruses are susceptible to uv light and many chemical cleaners, esp. bleach. No mention of quat ammonium compounds - and I am very doubtful a soap and water would be enough to kill - the article says "damage the microbes membrane". I think we should be very careful about how comfortable we are with regards to cleanliness. The article talks about "bioburdens" eg. Soil, blood, vomit and other organic material. I think chemists would also talk about biofilms - things that cover the organism and stop the chemical cleaner actually even reaching it!

http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/Disinfection_Sterilization/4_0efficacyDS.html

Concentration and Potency of Disinfectants
With other variables constant, and with one exception (iodophors), the more concentrated the disinfectant, the greater its efficacy and the shorter the time necessary to achieve microbial kill. Generally not recognized, however, is that all disinfectants are not similarly affected by concentration adjustments. For example, quaternary ammonium compounds and phenol have a concentration exponent of 1 and 6, respectively; thus, halving the concentration of a quaternary ammonium compound requires doubling its disinfecting time, but halving the concentration of a phenol solution requires a 64-fold (i.e., 26) increase in its disinfecting time 365, 413, 420.

Top of Page


Number and Location of Microorganisms
All other conditions remaining constant, the larger the number of microbes, the more time a germicide needs to destroy all of them. Spaulding illustrated this relation when he employed identical test conditions and demonstrated that it took 30 minutes to kill 10 B. atrophaeus (formerly Bacillus subtilis) spores but 3 hours to kill 100,000 Bacillus atrophaeus spores. This reinforces the need for scrupulous cleaning of medical instruments before disinfection and sterilization. Reducing the number of microorganisms that must be inactivated through meticulous cleaning, increases the margin of safety when the germicide is used according to the labeling and shortens the exposure time required to kill the entire microbial load. Researchers also have shown that aggregated or clumped cells are more difficult to inactivate than monodispersed cells 414.

The location of microorganisms also must be considered when factors affecting the efficacy of germicides are assessed. Medical instruments with multiple pieces must be disassembled and equipment such as endoscopes that have crevices, joints, and channels are more difficult to disinfect than are flat- surface equipment because penetration of the disinfectant of all parts of the equipment is more difficult. Only surfaces that directly contact the germicide will be disinfected, so there must be no air pockets and the equipment must be completely immersed for the entire exposure period. Manufacturers should be encouraged to produce equipment engineered for ease of cleaning and disinfection.

Top of Page


Innate Resistance of Microorganisms
Microorganisms vary greatly in their resistance to chemical germicides and sterilization processes (Figure 1) 342 Intrinsic resistance mechanisms in microorganisms to disinfectants vary. For example, spores are resistant to disinfectants because the spore coat and cortex act as a barrier, mycobacteria have a waxy cell wall that prevents disinfectant entry, and gram-negative bacteria possess an outer membrane that acts as a barrier to the uptake of disinfectants 341, 343-345.* Implicit in all disinfection strategies is the consideration that the most resistant microbial subpopulation controls the sterilization or disinfection time. That is, to destroy the most resistant types of microorganisms (i.e., bacterial spores), the user needs to employ exposure times and a concentration of germicide needed to achieve complete destruction. Except for prions, bacterial spores possess the highest innate resistance to chemical germicides, followed by coccidia (e.g., Cryptosporidium), mycobacteria (e.g., M. tuberculosis), nonlipid or small viruses (e.g., poliovirus, and coxsackievirus), fungi (e.g., Aspergillus, and Candida), vegetative bacteria (e.g., Staphylococcus, and Pseudomonas) and lipid or medium-size viruses (e.g., herpes, and HIV). The germicidal resistance exhibited by the gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria is similar with some exceptions (e.g., P. aeruginosa which shows greater resistance to some disinfectants) 369, 415, 416. **P. aeruginosa also is significantly more resistant to a variety of disinfectants in its "naturally occurring" state than are cells subcultured on laboratory media 415, 417.* Rickettsiae, Chlamydiae, and mycoplasma cannot be placed in this scale of relative resistance because information about the efficacy of germicides against these agents is limited 418.* Because these microorganisms contain lipid and are similar in structure and composition to other bacteria, they can be predicted to be inactivated by the same germicides that destroy lipid viruses and vegetative bacteria. A known exception to this supposition is Coxiella burnetti, which has demonstrated resistance to disinfectants 419.


Considering the length of the disinfection time, which depends on the potency of the germicide, also is important. This was illustrated by Spaulding who demonstrated using the mucin-loop test that 70% isopropyl alcohol destroyed 104 M. tuberculosis in 5 minutes, whereas a simultaneous test with 3% phenolic required 2–3 hours to achieve the same level of microbial kill 14.

Top of Page


Physical and Chemical Factors
Several physical and chemical factors also influence disinfectant procedures: temperature, pH, relative humidity, and water hardness. For example, the activity of most disinfectants increases as the temperature increases, but some exceptions exist. Furthermore, too great an increase in temperature causes the disinfectant to degrade and weakens its germicidal activity and thus might produce a potential health hazard.

An increase in pH improves the antimicrobial activity of some disinfectants (e.g., glutaraldehyde, quaternary ammonium compounds) but decreases the antimicrobial activity of others (e.g., phenols, hypochlorites, and iodine). The pH influences the antimicrobial activity by altering the disinfectant molecule or the cell surface 413.

Relative humidity is the single most important factor influencing the activity of gaseous disinfectants/sterilants, such as EtO, chlorine dioxide, and formaldehyde.

Water hardness (i.e., high concentration of divalent cations) reduces the rate of kill of certain disinfectants because divalent cations (e.g., magnesium, calcium) in the hard water interact with the disinfectant to form insoluble precipitates 13, 421.

Top of Page


Organic and Inorganic Matter
Organic matter in the form of serum, blood, pus, or fecal or lubricant material can interfere with the antimicrobial activity of disinfectants in at least two ways. Most commonly, interference occurs by a chemical reaction between the germicide and the organic matter resulting in a complex that is less germicidal or nongermicidal, leaving less of the active germicide available for attacking microorganisms. Chlorine and iodine disinfectants, in particular, are prone to such interaction. Alternatively, organic material can protect microorganisms from attack by acting as a physical barrier 422, 423.

The effects of inorganic contaminants on the sterilization process were studied during the 1950s and 1960s 424, 425.* These and other studies show the protection by inorganic contaminants of microorganisms to all sterilization processes results from occlusion in salt crystals 426, 427.* This further emphasizes the importance of meticulous cleaning of medical devices before any sterilization or disinfection procedure because both organic and inorganic soils are easily removed by washing 426.

Top of Page


Duration of Exposure
Items must be exposed to the germicide for the appropriate minimum contact time. Multiple investigators have demonstrated the effectiveness of low-level disinfectants against vegetative bacteria (e.g., Listeria, E. coli, Salmonella, VRE, MRSA), yeasts (e.g., Candida), mycobacteria (e.g., M. tuberculosis), and viruses (e.g., poliovirus) at exposure times of 30–60 seconds 46-64.* By law, all applicable label instructions on EPA-registered products must be followed. If the user selects exposure conditions that differ from those on the EPA-registered product label, the user assumes liability for any injuries resulting from off-label use and is potentially subject to enforcement action under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)

All lumens and channels of endoscopic instruments must contact the disinfectant. Air pockets interfere with the disinfection process, and items that float on the disinfectant will not be disinfected. The disinfectant must be introduced reliably into the internal channels of the device. The exact times for disinfecting medical items are somewhat elusive because of the effect of the aforementioned factors on disinfection efficacy. Certain contact times have proved reliable (Table 1), but, in general, longer contact times are more effective than shorter contact times.

Top of Page


Biofilms
Microorganisms may be protected from disinfectants by production of thick masses of cells 428 and extracellular materials, or biofilms 429-435.* Biofilms are microbial communities that are tightly attached to surfaces and cannot be easly removed.* Once these masses form, microbes within them can be resistant to disinfectants by multiple mechanisms, including physical characteristics of older biofilms, genotypic variation of the bacteria, microbial production of neutralizing enzymes, and physiologic gradients within the biofilm (e.g., pH). Bacteria within biofilms are up to 1,000 times more resistant to antimicrobials than are the same bacteria in suspension 436.* Although new decontamination methods 437 are being investigated for removing biofilms, chlorine and monochloramines can effectively inactivate biofilm bacteria 431* 438.* Investigators have hypothesized that the glycocalyx-like cellular masses on the interior walls of polyvinyl chloride pipe would protect embedded organisms from some disinfectants and be a reservoir for continuous contamination 429, 430, 439.* Biofilms have been found in whirlpools 440, dental unit waterlines441, and numerous medical devices (e.g., contact lenses, pacemakers, hemodialysis systems, urinary catheters, central venous catheters, endoscopes) 434, 436, 438, 442. *Their presence can have serious implications for immunocompromised patients and patients who have indwelling medical devices. Some enzymes 436, 443, 444 and detergents 436 can degrade biofilms or reduce numbers of viable bacteria within a biofilm, but no products are EPA-registered or FDA-cleared for this purpose.

This is a huge subject - with many variables affecting the outcome of disinfectant procedures. Perhaps we should starts thread to discuss.
 
Re: Decontamination of patients' apartments

Thank you Lizw. Interesting article. According to article Ebola viruses are susceptible to uv light and many chemical cleaners, esp. bleach. No mention of quat ammonium compounds - and I am very doubtful a soap and water would be enough to kill - the article says "damage the microbes membrane". I think we should be very careful about how comfortable we are with regards to cleanliness. The article talks about "bioburdens" eg. Soil, blood, vomit and other organic material. I think chemists would also talk about biofilms - things that cover the organism and stop the chemical cleaner actually even reaching it!

http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/Disinfection_Sterilization/4_0efficacyDS.html



This is a huge subject - with many variables affecting the outcome of disinfectant procedures. Perhaps we should starts thread to discuss.
Thank you for that very illuminating information. As a Lyme sufferer, I'm very familiar with biofilms, but I hadn't thought of them in connection with decontaminating surfaces.

MSF seems to have found chlorine bleach adequate for Ebola, but I suspect the time between contamination and clean-up may also be a significant factor.
 
Re: Decontamination of patients' apartments

Can anyone weigh in with a scientific background on the efficacy of ozone to sterilize/decontaminate these pathogens.

Only it would seem that if they could send one person in to set up an ozone generator (perhaps in conjunction with UV light setup) and seal the outside of the building and then flood the whole thing with ozone to kill the virus, it would limit the contact in terms of bodies in the building, and time spent there.

Just want to emphasize that I don't know enough about ozone sterilization (I've only seen passing references, and not bothered to investigate in depth yet) hence asking for someone with the science at their finger tips to weigh in with some more authority.
 
Re: Decontamination of patients' apartments

I suspect something like nitrogen dioxide would be an effective disinfectant, but saturating an apartment with it would require evacuating the whole building and tenting it much like is done for termite extermination. Given the lethality of ebola, mattresses and soiled fabrics would probably need to be boiled (or incinerated, but this gross overkill as ebola is not like anthrax spores) just to be sure. But, all this stuff about hazardous waste landfills and so forth is gross overkill. They just need to put the contaminated materials in a big cauldron to boil. After boiling, it can be safely disposed of as ordinary refuse.
 
Re: Decontamination of patients' apartments

Hydrogen peroxide vapor is being used to decontaminate the Dallas hospital - http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/20...disinfect-texas-hospital-with-ebola-patients/

Decontamination robots like are being used in the Dallas hospital, trying to contain the Ebola virus.* It sprays a hydrogen peroxide vapor that can kill viruses and other germs.

I know that ozone is used on teeth to destroy bacteria - but the dentist I know who uses this method says that it took years to perfect because you need a perfect seal around the teeth - or it doesn't work. A room or indeed a house would be near impossible to seal properly.
 
Re: Decontamination of patients' apartments

Source: http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2014/10/20/inside-look-into-decontaminated-ebola-apartment/

Firsthand Look Inside Decontaminated Ebola Apartment
October 20, 2014 8:25 PM

DALLAS (CBSDFW.COM) - For more than a week, people have seen the outside of apartments belonging to Amber Vinson and Nina Pham, the nurses who tested positive for the Ebola virus.

For health, safety and privacy reasons cameras were kept at a distance from the contaminated apartments. Reporters and the general public were blocked by caution tape and police officers; so, getting a close look of what was happening inside or even near the contaminated apartments was impossible.

But Monday the CBS 11 I-Team got a hold of state documents from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) that gives viewers a never-before seen look inside Amber Vinson?s apartment since being contaminated...

****************************

Source: http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2014/10/21/i-team-maps-route-taken-to-dispose-of-ebola-hazardous-waste/


I-Team Maps Route Taken To Dispose Of Ebola Hazardous Waste
October 21, 2014 5:16 PM

NORTH TEXAS (CBSDFW.COM) - The CBS 11 News I-Team has learned more about the hazardous waste taken from two Ebola patients? apartments. Investigative Reporter Mireya Villarreal looked at the route hazardous material crews took, from Dallas to just outside Houston, and the measures taken to keep the mission a secret.

Health experts with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention say the Ebola virus can only live for a few hours when it dries on a surface. Conversely, they say the virus can survive for several days if it is in liquid form...
 
Nurses with Ebola may recover to find few possessions

Nurses with Ebola may recover to find few possessions

Nurses with Ebola may recover to find few possessions

Sebastian Robertson, WFAA 6:48 p.m. CDT October 21, 2014

DALLAS -? New pictures released by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality show hazmat crews suiting up to begin the decontamination of two potentially Ebola-infected apartments in Dallas.

Crews from the Fort Worth-based company Protect Environmental are wearing full hazmat gear and breathing through respirators, as they begin packing up the nurses' belongings. They triple bag nearly everything inside and placing it in blue bins that will be driven nearly five hours to Port Arthur, Texas, to be incinerated.
...
While the Ebola virus does not live long without a human host and can be killed by bleach, experts advise decontamination is just too risky, with certain exceptions.

For the family of Thomas Eric Duncan, exceptions were made -- a grandmother's bible and family photos were saved.
...
http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/loca...sions-cleaning-crews-decontaminated/17689985/
 
Back
Top Bottom