Pathfinder
Editor, Senior Moderator
[h=1]Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases[/h]
[h=2]Culex Species Mosquitoes and Zika Virus[/h] To cite this article:
Huang Yan-Jang S., Ayers Victoria B., Lyons Amy C., Unlu Isik, Alto Barry W., Cohnstaedt Lee W., Higgs Stephen, and Vanlandingham Dana L.. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. August 2016, ahead of print. doi:10.1089/vbz.2016.2058.
Online Ahead of Print: August 24, 2016
Yan-Jang S. Huang,[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP] Victoria B. Ayers,[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP] Amy C. Lyons,[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP] Isik Unlu,[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP] Barry W. Alto,[SUP]5[/SUP] Lee W. Cohnstaedt,[SUP]6[/SUP] Stephen Higgs,[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP] and Dana L. Vanlandingham[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP]
[SUP]1[/SUP]Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
[SUP]2[/SUP]Biosecurity Research Institute, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
[SUP]3[/SUP]Center for Vector Biology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
[SUP]4[/SUP]Mercer County Mosquito Control, Trenton, New Jersey.
[SUP]5[/SUP]Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, University of Florida, Vero Beach, Florida.
[SUP]6[/SUP]Arthropod-Borne Animal Disease Research Unit, Agriculture Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Manhattan, Kansas.
Address correspondence to:
Dana L. Vanlandingham
Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology
Kansas State University K-221 Mosier Hall
Manhattan, KS 66506-5802
E-mail: dlvanlan@vet.ksu.edu
Navigate ArticleTop of pageAuthor informationABSTRACT <<IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsConclusions and Discussio...AcknowledgmentsAuthor's ContributionsAuthor Disclosure Stateme...References [h=3]ABSTRACT[/h]
Recent reports of Zika virus (ZIKV) isolates from Culex species mosquitoes have resulted in concern regarding a lack of knowledge on the number of competent vector species for ZIKV transmission in the new world. Although observations in the field have demonstrated that ZIKV isolation can be made from Culex species mosquitoes, the detection of ZIKV in these mosquitoes is not proof of their involvement in a ZIKV transmission cycle. Detection may be due to recent feeding on a viremic vertebrate, and is not indicative of replication in the mosquito. In this study, susceptibility of recently colonized Culex species mosquitoes was investigated. The results showed a high degree of refractoriness among members of Culex pipiens complex to ZIKV even when exposed to high-titer bloodmeals. Our finding suggests that the likelihood of Culex species mosquitoes serving as secondary vectors for ZIKV is very low, therefore vector control strategies for ZIKV should remain focused on Aedes species mosquitoes. Our demonstration that Culex quinquefasciatus from Vero Beach, FL, is refractory to infection with ZIKV is especially important and timely. Based on our data, we would conclude that the autochthonous cases of Zika in Florida are not due to transmission by C. quinquefasciatus, and so control efforts should focus on other species, logically Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus.
...
http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/vbz.2016.2058
[h=2]Culex Species Mosquitoes and Zika Virus[/h] To cite this article:
Huang Yan-Jang S., Ayers Victoria B., Lyons Amy C., Unlu Isik, Alto Barry W., Cohnstaedt Lee W., Higgs Stephen, and Vanlandingham Dana L.. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. August 2016, ahead of print. doi:10.1089/vbz.2016.2058.
Online Ahead of Print: August 24, 2016
- Full Text HTML
- Full Text PDF (89 KB)
- Full Text PDF with Links (108.2 KB)
Yan-Jang S. Huang,[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP] Victoria B. Ayers,[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP] Amy C. Lyons,[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP] Isik Unlu,[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP] Barry W. Alto,[SUP]5[/SUP] Lee W. Cohnstaedt,[SUP]6[/SUP] Stephen Higgs,[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP] and Dana L. Vanlandingham[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP]
[SUP]1[/SUP]Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
[SUP]2[/SUP]Biosecurity Research Institute, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
[SUP]3[/SUP]Center for Vector Biology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
[SUP]4[/SUP]Mercer County Mosquito Control, Trenton, New Jersey.
[SUP]5[/SUP]Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, University of Florida, Vero Beach, Florida.
[SUP]6[/SUP]Arthropod-Borne Animal Disease Research Unit, Agriculture Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Manhattan, Kansas.
Address correspondence to:
Dana L. Vanlandingham
Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology
Kansas State University K-221 Mosier Hall
Manhattan, KS 66506-5802
E-mail: dlvanlan@vet.ksu.edu
Navigate ArticleTop of pageAuthor informationABSTRACT <<IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsConclusions and Discussio...AcknowledgmentsAuthor's ContributionsAuthor Disclosure Stateme...References [h=3]ABSTRACT[/h]
Recent reports of Zika virus (ZIKV) isolates from Culex species mosquitoes have resulted in concern regarding a lack of knowledge on the number of competent vector species for ZIKV transmission in the new world. Although observations in the field have demonstrated that ZIKV isolation can be made from Culex species mosquitoes, the detection of ZIKV in these mosquitoes is not proof of their involvement in a ZIKV transmission cycle. Detection may be due to recent feeding on a viremic vertebrate, and is not indicative of replication in the mosquito. In this study, susceptibility of recently colonized Culex species mosquitoes was investigated. The results showed a high degree of refractoriness among members of Culex pipiens complex to ZIKV even when exposed to high-titer bloodmeals. Our finding suggests that the likelihood of Culex species mosquitoes serving as secondary vectors for ZIKV is very low, therefore vector control strategies for ZIKV should remain focused on Aedes species mosquitoes. Our demonstration that Culex quinquefasciatus from Vero Beach, FL, is refractory to infection with ZIKV is especially important and timely. Based on our data, we would conclude that the autochthonous cases of Zika in Florida are not due to transmission by C. quinquefasciatus, and so control efforts should focus on other species, logically Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus.
...
http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/vbz.2016.2058