Niko
Editor, Senior Moderator
Cross-Protection against H5N1 Influenza Virus Infection Is Afforded by Intranasal Inoculation with Seasonal Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="450"> <tbody> <tr><td class="contentAuthor"><author><fname>Takeshi </fname><surname>Ichinohe</surname></author>, <author><fname>Shin-ichi </fname><surname>Tamura</surname></author>, <author><fname>Akira </fname><surname>Kawaguchi</surname></author>, <author><fname>Ai </fname><surname>Ninomiya</surname></author>, <author><fname>Masaki </fname><surname>Imai</surname></author>, <author><fname>Shigeyuki </fname><surname>Itamura</surname></author>, <author><fname>Takato </fname><surname>Odagiri</surname></author>, <author><fname>Masato </fname><surname>Tashiro</surname></author>, <author><fname>Hidehiro </fname><surname>Takahashi</surname></author>, <author><fname>Hirofumi </fname><surname>Sawa</surname></author>, <author><fname>William M. </fname><surname>Mitchell</surname></author>, <author><fname>David R. </fname><surname>Strayer</surname></author>, <author><fname>William A. </fname><surname>Carter</surname></author>, <author><fname>Joe </fname><surname>Chiba</surname></author>, <author><fname>Takeshi </fname><surname>Kurata</surname></author>, <author><fname>Tetsutaro </fname><surname>Sata</surname></author>, and <author><fname>Hideki </fname><surname>Hasegawa</surname></author></td></tr> <tr><td>
</td></tr> <tr><td>Volume 196(2007), pages 1313 - 1320
DOI: 10.1086/521304
</td></tr> </tbody> </table> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td>Abstract
</td></tr> <tr><td>Background. Avian H5N1 influenza A virus is an emerging pathogen with the potential to cause substantial human morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the ability of currently licensed seasonal influenza vaccine to confer cross-protection against highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus in mice.
Methods. BALB/c mice were inoculated 3 times, either intranasally or subcutaneously, with the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine licensed in Japan for the 2005
2006 season. The vaccine included A/NewCaledonia/20/99 (H1N1), A/NewYork/55/2004 (H3N2), and B/Shanghai/361/2002 viral strains and was administered together with poly(I)
oly(C<tinf>12</tinf>U) (Ampligen) as an adjuvant. At 14 days after the final inoculation, the inoculated mice were challenged with either the A/HongKong/483/97, the A/Vietnam/1194/04, or the A/Indonesia/6/05 strain of H5N1 influenza virus.
Results. Compared with noninoculated mice, those inoculated intranasally manifested cross-reactivity of mucosal IgA and serum IgG with H5N1 virus, as well as both a reduced H5N1 virus titer in nasal-wash samples and increased survival, after challenge with H5N1 virus. Subcutaneous inoculation did not induce a cross-reactive IgA response and did not afford protection against H5N1 viral infection.
Conclusions. Intranasal inoculation with annual influenza vaccine plus the Toll-like receptor
3 agonist, poly(I)
oly(C<tinf>12</tinf>U), may overcome the problem of a limited supply of H5N1 virus vaccine by providing cross-protective mucosal immunity against H5N1 viruses with pandemic potential.
</td></tr> <tr><td>
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/uc...5884672617836740132Guest¤t_page=content
</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="450"> <tbody> <tr><td class="contentAuthor"><author><fname>Takeshi </fname><surname>Ichinohe</surname></author>, <author><fname>Shin-ichi </fname><surname>Tamura</surname></author>, <author><fname>Akira </fname><surname>Kawaguchi</surname></author>, <author><fname>Ai </fname><surname>Ninomiya</surname></author>, <author><fname>Masaki </fname><surname>Imai</surname></author>, <author><fname>Shigeyuki </fname><surname>Itamura</surname></author>, <author><fname>Takato </fname><surname>Odagiri</surname></author>, <author><fname>Masato </fname><surname>Tashiro</surname></author>, <author><fname>Hidehiro </fname><surname>Takahashi</surname></author>, <author><fname>Hirofumi </fname><surname>Sawa</surname></author>, <author><fname>William M. </fname><surname>Mitchell</surname></author>, <author><fname>David R. </fname><surname>Strayer</surname></author>, <author><fname>William A. </fname><surname>Carter</surname></author>, <author><fname>Joe </fname><surname>Chiba</surname></author>, <author><fname>Takeshi </fname><surname>Kurata</surname></author>, <author><fname>Tetsutaro </fname><surname>Sata</surname></author>, and <author><fname>Hideki </fname><surname>Hasegawa</surname></author></td></tr> <tr><td>
</td></tr> <tr><td>Volume 196(2007), pages 1313 - 1320
DOI: 10.1086/521304
</td></tr> </tbody> </table> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td>Abstract
</td></tr> <tr><td>Background. Avian H5N1 influenza A virus is an emerging pathogen with the potential to cause substantial human morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the ability of currently licensed seasonal influenza vaccine to confer cross-protection against highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus in mice.
Methods. BALB/c mice were inoculated 3 times, either intranasally or subcutaneously, with the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine licensed in Japan for the 2005
Results. Compared with noninoculated mice, those inoculated intranasally manifested cross-reactivity of mucosal IgA and serum IgG with H5N1 virus, as well as both a reduced H5N1 virus titer in nasal-wash samples and increased survival, after challenge with H5N1 virus. Subcutaneous inoculation did not induce a cross-reactive IgA response and did not afford protection against H5N1 viral infection.
Conclusions. Intranasal inoculation with annual influenza vaccine plus the Toll-like receptor
</td></tr> <tr><td>
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/uc...5884672617836740132Guest¤t_page=content
</td></tr></tbody></table>