• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Comparison of initial feasibility of host cell lines for viral vaccine production

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Virol Methods. 2013 May 14. pii: S0166-0934(13)00175-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.04.020. [Epub ahead of print]
Comparison of initial feasibility of host cell lines for viral vaccine production.
Vlecken DH, Pelgrim RP, Ruminski S, Bakker WA, van der Pol LA.
Source

Institute for Translational Vaccinology, PO BOX 450, 3720 AL Bilthoven, the Netherlands. Electronic address: Danielle.Vlecken@intravacc.nl.
Abstract

In order to reduce the time required for the development and production of viral vaccines, host cell lines should be available as expression systems for production of viral vaccines against groups of viral pathogens. A selection of cell lines was compared for their initial feasibility as expression system for the replication of polioviruses, influenza A viruses and respiratory syncytial virus (wild type strain A2). Six adherent cell lines (Vero, HEK-293, MRC-5, CHO-K1, BHK-21 c13, MDCK) and six single cell suspension cell lines (CAP, AGE1.CR.HS, sCHO-K1, BHK-21 c13 2p, MDCK SFS) were studied for their ability to propagate viruses. First, maximum cell densities were determined. Second, virus receptor expression and polarization of the cell lines regarding receptor distribution of eight different viruses were monitored using flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry. Organization of the actin cytoskeleton was studied by transfection of the cells with Lifeact?, a construct coding for actin-EGFP. Finally, the ability to produce virus progeny of the viruses studied was assayed for each cell line. The results suggest that single cell suspension cell lines grown on serum free medium are the best candidates to serve as host cell lines for virus replication.

Copyright ? 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.

PMID:
23684847
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23684847
 
Back
Top Bottom