• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Comparison of diagnostic test performance in a population of high risk young adults versus a general population presenting with influenza

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Virol. 2015 Jul;68:49-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.04.020. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
[h=1]Comparison of diagnostic test performance in a population of high risk young adults versus a general population presenting with influenza.[/h] Scheuller HS[SUP]1[/SUP], Lott L[SUP]2[/SUP], Haas R[SUP]2[/SUP], Tavish M[SUP]2[/SUP], Danaher P[SUP]3[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Upper respiratory tract infection (URI) is a well-documented cause of morbidity, extra expense and lost training time among basic military trainees (BMTs).
[h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] The goal of this study is to better understand how influenza diagnostic tests perform in the BMT population, and how this performance differs from the general population.
[h=4]STUDY DESIGN:[/h] Laboratory test data was collected in a prospective study that enrolled Department of Defense beneficiaries presenting to medical facilities in San Antonio, TX with URI symptoms between January 2005 and March 2011. Three laboratory tests for influenza were performed during the study period: polymerase chain reaction (PCR), enzyme immunoassay (EIA), and viral culture. Patients were grouped into BMT and non-BMT populations and the tests from each of these populations were compared for statistical differences. Similar comparisons were made with various sub-groups to include: influenza A versus influenza B, and influenza A subtypes: (H1N1) versus (H3N2) versus (H1N1)pdm09.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Among 4448 participants enrolled, 466 (10.5%) tested positive for influenza. Sensitivity of viral culture differed between BMTs and non-BMTs: 63% versus 41% (p<0.01). There was no difference in the sensitivity of PCR or EIA between the two populations. The sensitivities of viral culture, EIA and PCR were higher in those infected with influenza A than in those infected with influenza B. The sensitivity of viral culture was significantly higher in (H1N1)pdm09 subtype cases.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Viral culture performed better in BMTs than in non-BMTs. These differences are likely attributable to the younger age of the BMTs.
Published by Elsevier B.V.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Basic military trainee; Enzyme immunoassay (EIA); Influenza; Polymerase chain reaction (PCR); Viral culture

PMID: 26071335 [PubMed - in process]
 
Back
Top Bottom