• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Transl Sci . PBPK-led assessment of antimalarial drugs as candidates for Covid-19: Simulating concentrations at the site of action to inform r

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Transl Sci


. 2024 Jul;17(7):e13865.
doi: 10.1111/cts.13865. PBPK-led assessment of antimalarial drugs as candidates for Covid-19: Simulating concentrations at the site of action to inform repurposing strategies

Nada Abla[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lisa M Almond[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jennifer J Bonner[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Naomi Richardson[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Timothy N C Wells[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jörg J Möhrle[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

The urgent need for safe, efficacious, and accessible drug treatments to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prompted a global effort to evaluate drug repurposing opportunities. Pyronaridine and amodiaquine are both components of approved antimalarials with in vitro activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In vitro activity does not always translate to clinical efficacy across a therapeutic dose range. This study applied available, verified, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for pyronaridine, amodiaquine, and its active metabolite N-desethylamodiaquine (DEAQ) to predict drug concentrations in lung tissue relative to plasma or blood in the default healthy virtual population. Lung exposures were compared to published data across the reported range of in vitro EC[SUB]50[/SUB] values against SARS-CoV-2. In the multicompartment permeability-limited PBPK model, the predicted total C[SUB]max[/SUB] in lung mass for pyronaridine was 34.2 μM on Day 3, 30.5-fold greater than in blood (1.12 μM) and for amodiaquine was 0.530 μM, 8.83-fold greater than in plasma (0.060 μM). In the perfusion-limited PBPK model, the DEAQ predicted total C[SUB]max[/SUB] on Day 3 in lung mass (30.2 μM) was 21.4-fold greater than for plasma (1.41 μM). Based on the available in vitro data, predicted drug concentrations in lung tissue for pyronaridine and DEAQ, but not amodiaquine, appeared sufficient to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication. Simulations indicated standard dosing regimens of pyronaridine-artesunate and artesunate-amodiaquine have potential to treat COVID-19. These findings informed repurposing strategies to select the most relevant compounds for clinical investigation in COVID-19. Clinical data for model verification may become available from ongoing clinical studies.


 
Back
Top Bottom