• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Otolaryngol . Efficacy of topical steroids for the treatment of olfactory disorders caused by COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Otolaryngol


. 2022 Mar 30.
doi: 10.1111/coa.13933. Online ahead of print.
Efficacy of topical steroids for the treatment of olfactory disorders caused by COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis


Do Hyun Kim[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sung Won Kim[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Minju Kang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Se Hwan Hwang[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effect of topical steroids on acute-onset olfactory dysfunction in patients infected with COVID-19.
Design and setting: Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Participants: Patients infected with COVID-19.
Main outcome measures: PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science, SCOPUS, Cochrane database, and Google Scholar were searched for articles up to September 2021. We analyzed studies comparing the improvement of olfactory dysfunction between topical steroid treatment and control groups (placebo or no treatment). In addition, we performed a subgroup analysis by study type.
Results: The improvement of olfactory score at 2 (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.7272, 95% confidence interval = [0.3851, 1.0692], p < 0.0001, I[SUP]2[/SUP] = 62.1%) and 4 weeks posttreatment (SMD = 1.0440 [0.6777, 1.4102], p < 0.0001, I[SUP]2[/SUP] = 61.2%) was statistically greater in the treatment than control group. However, there was no significant difference (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4345 [0.9525, 2.1604], p = 0.0842, I[SUP]2[/SUP] = 45.4%) in the incidence of fully recovery from anosmia/hyposmia between the treatment and control groups. In subgroup analysis, there were no significant differences in the improvement of olfactory score at 4 weeks posttreatment (OR = 0.6177 [0.1309, 1.1045] vs. 0.1720 [0.8002, 1.5438], p = 0.0761) or the incidence of full recovery from anosmia/hyposmia (OR = 1.8478 [0.6092, 5.6053] vs. 1.3784 [0.8872, 2.1414], p = 0.8038) between randomized and non-randomized controlled trials.
Conclusions: Although this meta-analysis found that topical steroids improved the acute onset olfactory dysfunction caused by COVID-19, there was no difference in the rate of full olfactory recovery between treated and control patients.

Keywords: coronavirus infections; nasopharynx; saliva; specimen handling; treatment outcome.
 
Back
Top Bottom