• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Infect Dis . Safety and Efficacy of CR6261 in an Influenza A H1N1 Healthy Human Challenge Model

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Infect Dis


. 2020 Nov 19;ciaa1725.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1725. Online ahead of print.
Safety and Efficacy of CR6261 in an Influenza A H1N1 Healthy Human Challenge Model


Alison Han[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lindsay Czajkowski[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Luz Angela Rosas[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Adriana Cervantes-Medina[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yongli Xiao[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Monica Gouzoulis[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Keith Lumbard[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Sally Hunsberger[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Susan Reed[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rani Athota[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Holly Ann Baus[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Amy Lwin[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Jerald Sadoff[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Jeffery K Taubenberger[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Matthew J Memoli[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: It is imperative to identify new targets for improved vaccines and therapeutics against influenza and one such target is the relatively conserved stalk region of the influenza A hemagglutinin (HA) surface protein.
Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, Phase II placebo-controlled trial of a monoclonal antibody that targets the HA stalk (CR6261) in a H1N1pdm09 healthy volunteer human challenge model. A single 50mg/kg dose of CR6261 was infused 24 hours after challenge and the primary efficacy outcome was area under the curve of viral RNA detection over time.
Results: Ninety-one healthy volunteers were randomized and underwent influenza challenge; 49 received CR6261 and 42 placebo. CR6261 had no statistically significant effect on AUC (AUC 48.56 log (copies/mL) x days, IQR 202 vs. AUC 25.53 log (copies/mL) x days, IQR 155), P=0.315), and no clinically significant effect on influenza disease measures including number of symptoms, duration of symptoms, or FLU-PRO scores. Preexisting anti-NA antibody titers were most predictive of reduced influenza disease. CR6261 reached a mean peak serum concentration of 1x10 6 ng/ml 15 minutes after infusion, and a mean peak of 5.97x10 2 ng/ml in the nasal mucosa 2-3 days after infusion.
Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that a monoclonal anti-stalk approach to prevent or treat influenza infection may be limited in efficacy. Future approaches should consider including and evaluating anti-stalk antibodies as part of a multi-faceted strategy rather than as a standalone therapeutic.

Keywords: Anti-HA stalk antibody; CHIM; Challenge study; HA Stalk; Influenza A.
 
Back
Top Bottom