• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Chest . Characterization of experimental and clinical bioaerosol generation during potential aerosol-generating procedures

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Chest


. 2020 Jul 21;S0012-3692(20)31955-3.
doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.07.026. Online ahead of print.
Characterization of experimental and clinical bioaerosol generation during potential aerosol-generating procedures


Nathan Doggett[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chung-Wai Chow[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Samira Mubareka[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: During medical procedures with the potential to produce aerosols such as bronchoscopy, intubation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation, healthcare workers (HCWs) may be exposed to infectious bioaerosols. This is of particular concern when high consequence pathogens such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are circulating. Thus far thousands of HCWs have been infected, 14.8% of these have severe disease and several have died[SUP]1[/SUP]. However, the determinants of aerosol generation during such procedures and their relative risk to HCWs remain poorly characterized.
Research question: We sought to characterize aerosols produced during airway intubation using an uninfected translational animal model and in human subjects undergoing elective aerosol-generating procedures. We also determined the particle size distribution of generated particles.
Study design: and Methods. Aerosol generation was measured during highly controlled experimental (pig) intubations (N=16) and elective bronchoscopies in uninfected patients (N=49) using an optical particle counter (OPC). Recovery of normal respiratory flora was used as a surrogate for pathogen dispersion.
Results: There was a small but significant (p = 0.03) decrease in 0.3 μm particles during highly controlled pig intubations compared to baseline. The concentration of 1.0 μm and 5.0 μm aerosol particles did not significantly change though oral bacteria were collected from the air. For elective patient bronchoscopies, there was a significant decrease in the generation of larger particles (1.0 μm and 5.0 μm) compared to baseline (p < 0.01), however, 18 of 39 (46%) of patients showed increased aerosol production in 0.3 μm sized particles, 4 of whom demonstrated significant increases.
Interpretation: While the total amount of aerosols produced during intubation and bronchoscopy did not increase significantly relative to pre-procedural levels, a small number of participants showed a significant increase in submicron particle emission, meriting further research to delineate determinants of fine particle production during aerosol-generating procedures.
 
Back
Top Bottom