• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Cell Rep . Cryo-EM structures of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 spike

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Cell Rep


. 2022 Jun 8;111009.
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111009. Online ahead of print.
Cryo-EM structures of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 spike


Victoria Stalls[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jared Lindenberger[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sophie M-C Gobeil[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rory Henderson[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Rob Parks[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Maggie Barr[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Margaret Deyton[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mitchell Martin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Katarzyna Janowska[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Xiao Huang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Aaron May[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Micah Speakman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Esther Beaudoin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Bryan Kraft[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Xiaozhi Lu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Robert J Edwards[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Amanda Eaton[SUP] 1 [/SUP], David C Montefiori[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Wilton B Williams[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kevin O Saunders[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Kevin Wiehe[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Barton F Haynes[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Priyamvada Acharya[SUP] 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron BA.2 sub-lineage has gained in proportion relative to BA.1. Because spike (S) protein variations may underlie differences in their pathobiology, here we determine cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of the BA.2 S ectodomain and compare these with previously determined BA.1 S structures. BA.2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) mutations induce remodeling of the RBD structure, resulting in tighter packing and improved thermostability. Interprotomer RBD interactions are enhanced in the closed (or 3-RBD-down) BA.2 S, while the fusion peptide is less accessible to antibodies than in BA.1. Binding and pseudovirus neutralization assays reveal extensive immune evasion while defining epitopes of two outer RBD face-binding antibodies, DH1044 and DH1193, that neutralize both BA.1 and BA.2. Taken together, our results indicate that stabilization of the closed state through interprotomer RBD-RBD packing is a hallmark of the Omicron variant and show differences in key functional regions in the BA.1 and BA.2 S proteins.

Keywords: CP: Microbiology; Omicron BA.2; SARS-CoV-2 spike; cryoelectron microscopy; fusion peptide; immune evasion; receptor binding domain.
 
Back
Top Bottom