• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

CDC did not test microcephaly babies for Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), an underdiagnosed fetal teratogen?

Emily

Editor, Senior Moderator
It was part of the workup for a 2002 case in New York where a baby was born with severe birth defects to a woman with West Nile:

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5150a3.htm
...and serologic tests were negative for lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection and toxoplasmosis

Yet this test was not listed as being part of the workup for the babies from Brazil:

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/mm6503e2.htm
All 35 infants in the cohort tested negative for syphilis, toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, and herpes simplex virus infections.

I'm wondering why since LCMV is said to have a worldwide distribution and must be in South America since a couple of children in a home for the severely disabled in Argentina tested positive for exposure:
www.cfsph.iastate.edu/Factsheets/pdfs/lymphocytic_choriomeningitis.pdf

Periventricular calcifications are found in LCMV and in the Brazil babies:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...brain-damage-worse-than-what-you-re-told.html
https://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/33/3/370.full
https://pedclerk.bsd.uchicago.edu/page/torch-infections

The mothers in the CDC study were screened to have had rashes, I think, but you can have rashes with LCMV, though it is rarer. But LCMV can also be asymptomatic in mothers who have babies with congenital infections. One of the theories about why Zika may have resulted in uncharacteristic damages in Brazil is that there was a co-infection in those cases.

So I am wondering if there could be an epizootic of LCMV going on in Brazil. Too bad CDC didn't test, but maybe there is a reason they ruled it out without testing. I just hope money was not an issue.



Dr. Tom Frieden ‏@DrFriedenCDC 14h14 hours ago Proposed emergency funds would improve CDC laboratory capacity to test for #Zika, other infectious diseases http://1.usa.gov/1nT3uEm
 
Back
Top Bottom