• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMJ Open . The changing nature of worry about COVID-19 among the English public: a secondary analysis of 73 national, cross-sectional surveys, Janua

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMJ Open


. 2024 Oct 21;14(10):e088027.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088027. The changing nature of worry about COVID-19 among the English public: a secondary analysis of 73 national, cross-sectional surveys, January 2020 to April 2022

G James Rubin[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Louise E Smith[SUP] 3 2 4 [/SUP], Richard Amlôt[SUP] 2 4 [/SUP], Nicola T Fear[SUP] 1 5 [/SUP], Henry Ww Potts[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Susan Michie[SUP] 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Objectives: To investigate worry about COVID-19 during the pandemic, and whether worry was associated with phase of the pandemic, COVID-19 death and incidence rates, Government interventions (including lockdown and advertising), age, being clinically at-risk, ethnicity, thinking that the Government had put the right measures in place, perceived risk of COVID-19 to self and the UK, and perceived severity of COVID-19.
Design: Secondary analysis of a series of cross-sectional surveys.
Setting: 73 online surveys conducted for the English Department of Health and Social Care between 28 January 2020 and 13 April 2022.
Participants: Participants were people aged 16 years and over living in the UK (approximately 2000 per wave).
Primary outcome measures: Our primary outcome was self-reported worry about COVID-19.
Results: Rates of being 'extremely' or 'very' worried changed over time. Worry increased as infection rates increased and fell during lockdowns, but the association became less obvious over time. Respondents aged 60 years and over were less likely to be worried after the launch of the vaccination campaign, while those who were clinically at-risk or from a minoritised ethnic community were more likely to be worried. Higher worry was associated with higher perceived risk, and higher perceived severity of COVID-19. There was no evidence for an association with agreeing that the Government was putting the right measures in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19. The launch of graphic Government advertising campaigns about COVID-19 had no noticeable effect on levels of public worry.
Conclusions: In future infectious disease outbreaks, spikes in worry may attenuate over time, although some sections of society may experience higher anxiety than others.

Keywords: COVID-19; Health Surveys; PUBLIC HEALTH; Public health.

 
Back
Top