tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
BMJ Open
. 2025 Jul 17;15(7):e096904.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096904. Right-restricting measures implemented by Public Health Surveillance services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review protocol
Marcelo Dayrell Vivas[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tiago Correia[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Larissa Bragagnolo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Igor Antônio Lourenço da Silva[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Fernando Tureck[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Reinaldo Santos[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Samara Kielmann[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Debora do Carmo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Camila Avarca[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Franciele da Silva[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mariana Paes[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Luis Fernando Nogueira Tofani[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Arthur Chioro[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic's unprecedented nature has exposed significant vulnerabilities in most public health systems and highlighted the importance of coordinated responses across various levels of government. A global debate emerged on the types of health measures necessary to curb the rapid spread of contagious and/or lethal diseases. However, some of these measures involved restricting individual rights, raising significant ethical, legal and public health questions. The protocol of this systematic review aims to address a critical gap in the literature by analysing how Public Health Surveillance services worldwide implemented compulsory right-restricting measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, and what impacts these measures had on public health outcomes and individual rights.
Methods and analysis: This protocol focuses on studies about right-restricting measures enacted by Public Health Surveillance services during the COVID-19 pandemic. It will be unrestrictive as to period (starting in 2019, when the outbreak was identified), language or publication status in a preliminary stage. It will include only peer-reviewed publications, discarding opinion articles, editorials, conference papers and non-peer-reviewed publications. Considering the PICo strategy, the research question of this systematic review can be formulated as follows: Problem-right-restricting measures enacted by Public Health Surveillance services; Interest-implementation modalities and impacts on individual rights and public health outcomes; Context-COVID-19 pandemic. This protocol will use the following databases: Pubmed, Cochrane/CENTRAL, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. Considering the various measures that may have been adopted, the following categories of analysis will be used: (i) Public Health Surveillance as a field, (ii) the various specific areas of Health Surveillance, (iii) law enforcement, (iv) right-restricting measures and consent, (v) interactions between right-restricting measures and routine Public Health Surveillance functions, (vi) differences between countries and (vii) Health Surveillance lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic. These categories are not strictly mutually exclusive; however, each study will be assigned to the category most aligned with its primary focus. To ensure the validity and reliability of findings, each study will have its risk of bias assessed at both the study and outcome levels.
Ethics and dissemination: Patients and the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this systematic review. The results will be presented in one or more articles to be submitted to scientific journals and may also be presented at scientific conferences and to public policy makers.
Prospero registration number: This systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 20 November 2024 (registration number CRD42024613039).
Keywords: COVID-19; PUBLIC HEALTH; Systematic Review.
. 2025 Jul 17;15(7):e096904.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096904. Right-restricting measures implemented by Public Health Surveillance services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review protocol
Marcelo Dayrell Vivas[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tiago Correia[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Larissa Bragagnolo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Igor Antônio Lourenço da Silva[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Fernando Tureck[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Reinaldo Santos[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Samara Kielmann[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Debora do Carmo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Camila Avarca[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Franciele da Silva[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mariana Paes[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Luis Fernando Nogueira Tofani[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Arthur Chioro[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 40675643
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096904
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic's unprecedented nature has exposed significant vulnerabilities in most public health systems and highlighted the importance of coordinated responses across various levels of government. A global debate emerged on the types of health measures necessary to curb the rapid spread of contagious and/or lethal diseases. However, some of these measures involved restricting individual rights, raising significant ethical, legal and public health questions. The protocol of this systematic review aims to address a critical gap in the literature by analysing how Public Health Surveillance services worldwide implemented compulsory right-restricting measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, and what impacts these measures had on public health outcomes and individual rights.
Methods and analysis: This protocol focuses on studies about right-restricting measures enacted by Public Health Surveillance services during the COVID-19 pandemic. It will be unrestrictive as to period (starting in 2019, when the outbreak was identified), language or publication status in a preliminary stage. It will include only peer-reviewed publications, discarding opinion articles, editorials, conference papers and non-peer-reviewed publications. Considering the PICo strategy, the research question of this systematic review can be formulated as follows: Problem-right-restricting measures enacted by Public Health Surveillance services; Interest-implementation modalities and impacts on individual rights and public health outcomes; Context-COVID-19 pandemic. This protocol will use the following databases: Pubmed, Cochrane/CENTRAL, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. Considering the various measures that may have been adopted, the following categories of analysis will be used: (i) Public Health Surveillance as a field, (ii) the various specific areas of Health Surveillance, (iii) law enforcement, (iv) right-restricting measures and consent, (v) interactions between right-restricting measures and routine Public Health Surveillance functions, (vi) differences between countries and (vii) Health Surveillance lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic. These categories are not strictly mutually exclusive; however, each study will be assigned to the category most aligned with its primary focus. To ensure the validity and reliability of findings, each study will have its risk of bias assessed at both the study and outcome levels.
Ethics and dissemination: Patients and the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this systematic review. The results will be presented in one or more articles to be submitted to scientific journals and may also be presented at scientific conferences and to public policy makers.
Prospero registration number: This systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 20 November 2024 (registration number CRD42024613039).
Keywords: COVID-19; PUBLIC HEALTH; Systematic Review.