• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMJ Open . How does prior infection and vaccination relate to the risk of incident SARS-CoV-2 infection/reinfection? A prospective cohort study amo

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMJ Open


. 2026 May 12;16(5):e112893.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112893.
How does prior infection and vaccination relate to the risk of incident SARS-CoV-2 infection/reinfection? A prospective cohort study among nine clinical sites in the USA, February 2021 to January 2023

Ashley Judge[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Erika T Beidelman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], David B Allison[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Stephanie Dickinson[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kishore M Gadde[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Lilian Golzarri Arroyo[SUP] 2 [/SUP], John P Ioannidis[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Anna Lm Macagno[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jonathan T Macy[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Kevin C Maki[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Stanley Perlman[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Michael J Ricciardi[SUP] 9 10 [/SUP], Molly Rosenberg[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Christina Ludema[SUP] 11 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Free article Abstract

Objective: To estimate the relative effectiveness of vaccination (0, 1, 2, ≥3 doses) and prior infection, in combination, on risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection/reinfection.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Participants: We recruited participants for the Aegis Study from nine clinics across five US states. Participants must have been 18 years or older, had a history of a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-2 antigen or antibody test for SARS-CoV-2 with documentation or had no suspected or documented prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, intended to remain in study area for the next 12 months, and had elevated risk of future SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Exclusion criteria included acute illness, contraindication to phlebotomy, use of immunosuppressants or receipt of systemic immunoglobulins.
Methods: We used extended Cox regression with robust standard errors to estimate the association between time-varying number of vaccine doses and baseline prior infection on risk of infection/reinfection among a prospective cohort of US adults between February 2021 and January 2023, accounting for censoring using inverse probability of censoring weights. Additionally, to quantify possible exposure misclassification of prior infection by comparing prior infection operationalised as (1) documented/self-reported prior infection and (2) documented/self-reported prior infection plus nucleocapsid antibody indication of prior infection.
Results: Of n=2178 who completed enrolment, n=1887 adults (63% female; 65% non-Latino White) contributed 366 905 days of observation. Participants contributed an average of 7.2 months of follow-up between February 2021 and January 2023. 28% (n=533) of individuals were infected or reinfected during the study period. Similar relative effectiveness was observed between the two different operationalisations of prior infection. After correction for prior infection status in the nearly 16% of those without study documentation of prior infection who had nucleocapsid antibody levels comparable to documented cases, relative to the unvaccinated with no prior infection, estimated effectiveness generally increased with increasing vaccine doses and prior infection (without prior infection: one (17%, 95% CI -31% to 47%), two (49%, 95% CI 31% to 63%), ≥three (71%, 95% CI 58% to 80%) vaccine doses; with prior infection: none (56%, 95% CI 30% to 72%), one (71%, 95% CI 42% to 86%), two (65%, 95% CI 49% to 76%), ≥three (80%, 95% CI 68% to 88%) vaccine doses). Pairwise comparisons at each vaccine dose (ref: no prior infection) revealed that prior infection provided additional protection, with stronger relationships for no and one dose (none: 56% (95% CI 30% to 72%), one: 66% (95% CI 28% to 84%), two: 31% (95% CI 7% to 49%), ≥three 31% (95% CI 0% to 53%)). There was a marked decrease in the protection offered by vaccination, prior infection, or both in the Omicron period versus pre-Omicron period.
Conclusion: In our real-world observational sample, vaccination (with two and ≥three vaccine doses of any Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorization approved vaccine) and prior infection conferred benefits for protection against infection/reinfection. Re-classification of prior infection status based on antibody levels had little effect on results.

Keywords: COVID-19; Immunity; Prospective studies; Vaccination.

 
Back
Top Bottom