• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMC Infect Dis . Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of the BNT-162b2 vaccine and the ChAdOx1 vaccine for solid organ transplant recipients

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Infect Dis


. 2022 Oct 13;22(1):786.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07764-x.
Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of the BNT-162b2 vaccine and the ChAdOx1 vaccine for solid organ transplant recipients: a prospective study


Aziza A Ajlan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tariq Ali[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hassan Aleid[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Khalid Almeshari[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Edward DeVol[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Morad Ahmed Alkaff[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Layal Fajji[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Ali Alali[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Dani Halabi[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Sahar Althuwaidi[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Saad Alghamdi[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Asad Ullah[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Abdulrahman Alrajhi[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Khalid Bzeizi[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Reem Almaghrabi[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Kris Ann Hervera Marquez[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Bilal Elmikkaoui[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Eid Albogumi[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Haifa Aldakhil[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Moheeb Al-Awwami[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Dieter C Broering[SUP] 15 16 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and its resulting disease, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has spread to millions of people worldwide. Preliminary data from organ transplant recipients have shown reduced seroconversion rates after the administration of different SARS-CoV-2 vaccination platforms. However, it is unknown whether different vaccination platforms provide different levels of protection against SARS-CoV-2. To answer this question, we prospectively studied 431 kidney and liver transplant recipients (kidney: n = 230; liver: n = 201) who received either the ChAdOx1 vaccine (n = 148) or the BNT-162b2 vaccine (n = 283) and underwent an assessment of immunoglobulin M/immunoglobulin G spike antibody levels. The primary objective of the study is to directly compare the efficacy of two different vaccine platforms in solid organ transplant recipients by measuring of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against the RBD of the spike protein (anti-RBD) two weeks after first and second doses. Our secondary endpoints were solicited specific local or systemic adverse events within 7 days after the receipt of each dose of the vaccine. There was no difference in the primary outcome between the two vaccine platforms in patients who received two vaccine doses. Unresponsiveness was mainly linked to diabetes. The rate of response after the first dose among younger older patients was significantly larger; however, after the second dose this difference did not persist (p = 0.079). Side effects were similar to those that were observed during the pivotal trials.

Keywords: COVID-19; Immunity vaccine; Infection; Kidney transplant; Liver transplant.
 
Back
Top Bottom