• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMC: A cross-sectional study of pandemic influenza health literacy and the effect of a public health campaign

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
To ascertain the understanding of 2009 pandemic (H1N1) influenza and relevant infection control measures in an emergency department population and to assess the effectiveness of education campaigns in informing the public about the pandemic.

Methods: Questionnaires were administered to patients, visitors, non-clinical staff and volunteers. Data were collected on knowledge, preventative measures, information sources, attitudes to government and media reporting, perceived seriousness, behaviour change and intended compliance with future measures.

Results were used to construct an overall knowledge score.

Results: There were 252 participants. Traditional forms of mass media (138 [55%]) remained the principal information source.

Approximately 70% (176) accurately described mode of transmission and recommended precautions and 68% (175) reported behaviour change because of the pandemic. Gaps in knowledge included failure to identify certain high risk groups.

Recall of government campaigns was significantly associated with a higher knowledge score. 60% (151) thought that authorities and media had exaggerated the threat; only 40% (101) would comply with recommended measures in a future pandemic.

Conclusions: The knowledge regarding pandemic influenza was high in this population and positively affected by official campaigns.

Pandemic planning should address knowledge gaps and the impression that authorities had exaggerated the public-health threat.

Author: Namrata Devi Jhummon-MahadnacJonathan KnottCaroline Marshall
Credits/Source: BMC Research Notes 2012, 5:377



Published on: 2012-07-26

http://7thspace.com/headlines/41759...d_the_effect_of_a_public_health_campaign.html
 
Back
Top Bottom