• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Bird Samples From Mongolia Confirmed As H5N1 Avian Flu

Status
Not open for further replies.

AlaskaDenise

In Memoriam
<TABLE class=contentpaneopen><TBODY><TR><TD class=createdate vAlign=top colSpan=2>Wednesday, 29 August 2007

</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top colSpan=2>The United States Department of Agriculture has positively identified the pathogenic form of avian flu--H5N1--in samples taken from birds last week from Mongolia.

It is the first instance of this viral strain occurring in wild migratory birds with no apparent contact with domestic poultry or waterfowl.


Present in Mongolia for a health survey of wild bird populations in the south and north of the country, field veterinarians working for the Wildlife Conservation Society, Drs. William Karesh and Martin Gilbert responded to initial reports of the most recent avian influenza outbreak in Khuvsgul Province near the Russian border from the Mongolian Ministry of Food and Agriculture, which conducted preliminary testing of birds that died at Erkhel Lake.


Their finding coincided with confirmations of cases of avian influenza in Russia and Kazakhstan. Karesh and Gilbert immediately traveled to the site with a team of Mongolian virologists, veterinarians, and public health officials. Approximately 100 dead birds were found at the site.


The team--including personnel from the Wildlife Conservation Society, the Mongolian National Academy of Sciences, the Mongolian Institute of Veterinary Medicine, the State Central Veterinary Laboratory, Ministry of Food and Agriculture Veterinary Department, and the Ministry of Health Mongolian Center of Communicable Diseases--collected samples from hundreds of wild birds, both live and dead.


Wildlife and health experts maintain that indiscriminate culling of wild migratory bird populations would be ineffective in preventing the spread of avian flu. "Focusing our limited resources on the hubs and activities where humans, livestock, and wildlife come into close contact," says Dr. Karesh, is "the best hope for successfully preventing the spread of avian flu and protecting both people and animals."

http://www.mongolia-web.com/content/view/1336/2/

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Re: Bird Samples From Mongolia Confirmed As H5N1 Avian Flu

filing date is Wednesday, 29 August 2007

.
There is no doubt that this the the 2005 outbreak that began the denials concerning Qinghai H5N1 in wild birds. Although virtually everything the wildlife conservation group said in 2005 (couldn't be H5N1 because not enough wild birds were dead amd it wouldn't spread because it had burned itself out) was false, the same group is in this week's ProMed report on H5N1 in wild birds, and they are VERY active in Africa, once again insisting that the multiple introductions are due to trade.

This group, and their VERY active propaganda campaign, remain hazardous to the world's health.
 
Re: Bird Samples From Mongolia Confirmed As H5N1 Avian Flu

[11] Implications of wildlife trade on the movement of avian
influenza and other infectious diseases
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The global trade in wildlife provides disease transmission mechanisms
that not only result in human disease outbreaks, but also threaten
livestock, international trade, rural livelihoods, native wildlife
populations, and the health of ecosystems. Global movement of animals
for the pet trade is estimated at some 350 million live animals,
worth approximately USD 20 billion per year. Approximately
one-quarter of this trade is thought to be illegal, hence not
inspected or tested. Disease outbreaks resulting from trade in
wildlife have caused hundreds of billions of dollars of economic
damage globally. Rather than attempting to eradicate pathogens or the
wild species that may harbor them, a practical approach would include
decreasing the contact rate among species, including humans, at the
interface created by wildlife trade. Wild animals are captured,
transported, and sold either live or dead and commingled throughout
the process in a system of scale-free networks with major hubs rather
than random or evenly distributed supply systems. As focal points for
distribution and sales, the hubs provide control opportunities to
maximize the effects of regulatory efforts as demonstrated with
domestic animal trading systems (processing plants and wholesale and
retail markets, for example). Focusing efforts at markets to
regulate, reduce, or in some cases, eliminate the commercial trade in
wildlife could provide a cost-effective approach to decrease the
risks for disease in humans, domestic animals, wildlife, and ecosystems.

[Reference: William B. Karesh, Robert A. Cook, Martin Gilbert, James
Newcomb: Implications of wildlife trade on the movement of avian
influenza and other infectious diseases. J Wildl Dis 2007 43: S55-S59. Abstract
Full text PDF available at
<http://www.jwildlifedis.org/cgi/reprint/43/3_Supplement/S55>

http://www.promedmail.org/pls/prome..._BACK_PAGE,F2400_P1001_PUB_MAIL_ID:1000,39021

<TABLE summary=""><TBODY><TR><TD noWrap align=right>Archive Number</TD><TD noWrap align=left>20070828.2815</TD></TR><TR><TD noWrap align=right>Published Date</TD><TD noWrap align=left>28-AUG-2007</TD></TR><TR><TD noWrap align=right>Subject</TD><TD noWrap align=left>PRO/AH> Avian influenza, poultry vs migratory birds (34)</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>




</PRE>
 
Re: Bird Samples From Mongolia Confirmed As H5N1 Avian Flu

Thank you for the clarification, Dr. Niman.

I'll close this thread, since the original post was "recycled."

.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top