• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Biologicals . Vaccination and surveillance for high pathogenicity avian influenza in poultry-current situation and perspectives

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Biologicals


. 2025 May 12:91:101840.
doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2025.101840. Online ahead of print. Vaccination and surveillance for high pathogenicity avian influenza in poultry-current situation and perspectives

Nancy C Sajjadi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Celia Abolnik[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Francesca Baldinelli[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ian Brown[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Angus Cameron[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Sjaak de Wit[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Madhur Dhingra[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Olivier Espeisse[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Jean Luc Guerrin[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Timm Harder[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Jeremy Ho[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Tze-Hoong Chua[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Khaled Hussein[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Nicholas Lyons[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Isabella Monne[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Yukitake Okamuro[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Damian Tago Pacheco[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Gounalan Pavade[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Nicolas Poncon[SUP] 17 [/SUP], Teguh Yodiantara Prajitno[SUP] 18 [/SUP], Jose Gonzales Rojas[SUP] 19 [/SUP], David Swayne[SUP] 20 [/SUP], Arjan Stegeman[SUP] 21 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

The International Alliance for Biological Standardization (IABS), in collaboration with the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) convened a hybrid meeting on 22-23 October 2024 at the WOAH Headquarters (HQ) in Paris, France to discuss the global state of vaccination and surveillance for high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) in poultry. The primary objective of the meeting was to advance vaccination acceptance to both control virus spread and reduce disease. Vaccination is increasingly recognized as a tool to complement biosecurity, movement controls and stamping-out of infected flocks. However, concerns persist regarding the risk of undetected, sustained transmission (silent infection) in vaccinated flocks as a result of inadequate surveillance. This has contributed to both vaccination hesitancy and trade barriers. The meeting aimed to assess the current state of the art regarding HPAI surveillance programs in vaccinated populations and their effectiveness. Representatives of multiple stakeholders were invited to share their experiences and perspectives on the use of vaccination and accompanying surveillance to control the growing H5N1 panzootic and its global impact. Several conclusions and recommendations emerged as essential to advancing the acceptance of vaccination strategies. These included (1) the utility of quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) as a sensitive, specific and economical tool to detect virus in vaccinated populations, (2) regular testing of dead birds within a flock as a highly effective method for early detection of outbreaks in vaccinated flocks and demonstrating freedom from infection and, (3) the importance of collecting information on circulating field strains in the selection of candidate vaccine antigens to ensure adequate efficacy. Testing sentinel birds was deemed less effective for surveillance and serological testing of vaccinated birds was considered more useful for assessing immunity levels than for determining the infection status of a flock. There was broad agreement on the need to standardize surveillance outcomes in terms of accepted confidence levels to promote safe and fair trade. However, it was acknowledged that context and pragmatic considerations will shape the development of situation specific plans, which must be statistically valid, scientifically sound, economically feasible and operationally sustainable for both governments and industry. Concomitantly, it was recommended that trade policies tied to vaccination and surveillance should be based solely on science and risks. To this end, enforcement of existing international rules and resolution of disputes are considered a shared responsibility. Peer reviewed publications were proposed as a central mechanism for developing the stronger guidelines needed to facilitate fair trade agreements and enable implementation of global vaccination programs. Rapid dissemination of information, consistent messaging and exchange of virus isolates were also seen as critical for coordinating an effective global response to controlling HPAI.

Keywords: Bird flu; H5N1; High pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI); Surveillance; Trade; Vaccination.

 
Back
Top Bottom