• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Assessing the Relative Timeliness of Ontario's Syndromic Surveillance Systems for Early Detection of the 2009 Influenza H1N1 Pandemic Waves

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Can J Public Health. 2013 May 14;104(4):340-7.
Assessing the Relative Timeliness of Ontario's Syndromic Surveillance Systems for Early Detection of the 2009 Influenza H1N1 Pandemic Waves.
Chu A, Savage R, Whelan M, Rosella LC, Crowcroft NS, Willison D, Winter AL, Davies R, Gemmill I, Mucchal PK, Johnson I.
Source

Public Health Ontario. rachel.savage@oahpp.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:

Building on previous research noting variations in the operation and perceived utility of syndromic surveillance systems in Ontario, the timeliness of these different syndromic systems for detecting the onset of both 2009 H1N1 pandemic (A(H1N1)pdm09) waves relative to laboratory testing data was assessed using a standardized analytic algorithm.
METHODS:

Syndromic data, specifically local emergency department (ED) visit and school absenteeism data, as well as provincial Telehealth (telephone helpline) and antiviral prescription data, were analyzed retrospectively for the period April 1, 2009 to January 31, 2010. The C2-MEDIUM aberration detection method from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's EARS software was used to detect increases above expected in syndromic data, and compared to laboratory alerts, defined as notice of confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 cases over two consecutive days, to assess relative timeliness.
RESULTS:

In Wave 1, provincial-level alerts were detected for antiviral prescriptions and Telehealth respiratory calls before the laboratory alert. In Wave 2, Telehealth respiratory calls similarly alerted in advance of the laboratory, while local alerts from ED visit, antiviral prescription and school absenteeism data varied in timing relative to the laboratory alerts. Alerts from syndromic data were also observed to coincide with external factors such as media releases.
CONCLUSIONS:

Alerts from syndromic surveillance systems may be influenced by external factors and variation in system operations. Further understanding of both the impact of external factors on surveillance data and standardizing protocols for defining alerts is needed before the use of syndromic surveillance systems can be optimized.
KEYWORDS:

H1N1 subtype, Public health surveillance, algorithms, influenza A virus, outbreaks

PMID:
24044464
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24044464
 
Back
Top Bottom