• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol . Validation of oral-nasal specimen collection for influenza and respiratory syncytial virus detection

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol


. 2025 Apr 23;5(1):e99.
doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.66. eCollection 2025. Validation of oral-nasal specimen collection for influenza and respiratory syncytial virus detection

Matthew Young[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yuri Suico[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Omid Kyle Vojdani[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Janine McCready[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kevin Katz[SUP] 2 3 4 [/SUP], Scarlett Pourmatin[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Manija Rahimi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Christie Vermeiren[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jeff Powis[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Christopher Kandel[SUP] 1 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Objective: Respiratory virus testing is routinely performed and ways to obtain specimens aside from a nasopharyngeal swab are needed for pandemic preparedness. The main objective is to validate a self-collected oral-nasal swab for the detection of Influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).
Design: Diagnostic test validation of a self-collected oral nasal swab as compared to a provider-collected nasopharyngeal swab.
Setting: Emergency Department at Michael Garron Hospital.
Participants: Consecutive individuals who presented to the Emergency Department with a suspected viral upper respiratory tract infection were included if they self-collected an oral-nasal swab. Individuals testing positive for Influenza or RSV along with randomly selected participants who tested negative were eligible for inclusion.
Interventions: All participants had the paired oral-nasal swab tested using a multiplex respiratory virus polymerase chain reaction for the three respiratory pathogens and compared to the nasopharyngeal swab.
Results: 48 individuals tested positive for Influenza, severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or RSV along with 80 who tested negative. 110 were symptomatic with the median time from symptom onset to testing of 1 day (interquartile range 2-5 days). Using the clinical nasopharyngeal swab as the reference standard, the sensitivity was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.43-0.95) and specificity was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00) for RSV, sensitivity is 0.67 (95% CI, 0.49-0.81) and specificity is 0.96 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99) for Influenza.
Conclusions: Multiplex testing with a self-collected oral-nasal swab for Influenza and RSV is not an acceptable substitute for a healthcare provider collected nasopharyngeal swab primarily due to suboptimal Influenza test characteristics.


 
Back
Top