• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Anti-TB Programme WHO 'Led to Resistance'

Gert van der Hoek

In Memoriam - Editor, Senior Moderator
Anti-TB Programme 'Led to Resistance'

SciDev.Net (London)

23 October 2007

By Sharon Davis

A study has found that the WHO's tuberculosis (TB) programme in South Africa inadvertently helped a strain of TB-causing bacteria develop additional drug resistance.

The study will be published in the December issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases.

Researchers from the University of KwaZulu-Natal's Nelson Mandela School of Medicine tracked the development of drug resistance in a strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis over a 12-year period.

They found that by the time the WHO introduced their programme in South Africa in 2001 -- using a second-line medication to combat multidrug-resistant strains of TB -- at least one strain had already developed resistance to one or more of the second-line drugs.

But because the programme didn't conduct drug susceptibility tests, the new second-line medication was not only useless to TB patients infected with the resistant strain, but also led to the strain developing additional drug resistance.

This is because when an M. tuberculosis strain is resistant to a drug, it survives and can subsequently evolve resistance to additional drugs.

The strain eventually became extensively drug-resistant (XDR-TB), resistant to seven anti-TB drugs in total, including first-line and several second-line drugs.

"The spread of a highly transmissible strain of drug-resistant TB has been facilitated by applying standard treatment regimes for susceptible and multidrug-resistant TB in the absence of drug resistance surveillance," said Willem Strum, one of the authors and dean of the University's Nelson Mandela School of Medicine, in a press release.

XDR-TB poses a grave public health threat, especially to populations with high rates of HIV where TB/HIV co-infection is common as a result of lowered immunity. The greatest concern is that XDR-TB leaves some patients virtually untreatable with currently available drugs.

The same strain caused a 2006 outbreak of XDR-TB in South Africa amongst an HIV-positive population in the rural town of Tugela Ferry in KwaZulu-Natal. Fifty-two of 53 XDR-TB patients died within an average of 25 days.

The study authors call for the increased use of drug resistance surveillance programmes to help prevent the development of drug-resistant TB.

"Public health programmes for the treatment and control of infectious diseases need to be supported by drug resistance surveillance programmes," said Strum.

Reference: Clinical Infectious Diseases doi 10.1086/522987 (2007)

http://allafrica.com/stories/200710250623.html
 
Back
Top Bottom