• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther . Predicting the effectiveness of high-flow oxygen therapy in COVID-19 patients: a single-centre observational study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther


. 2022;54(1):12-17.
doi: 10.5114/ait.2022.113738.
Predicting the effectiveness of high-flow oxygen therapy in COVID-19 patients: a single-centre observational study


Felicitas Schmidt[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lorenz Nowak[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Florian Obereisenbuchler[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Justin Hetrodt[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Marion Heiß-Neumann[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Anna Schönlebe[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Katharina Heinig-Menhard[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wolfgang Gesierich[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jürgen Behr[SUP] 2 3 4 [/SUP], Rudolf Hatz[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], Julien Dinkel[SUP] 5 6 7 [/SUP], Mircea-Gabriel Stoleriu[SUP] 4 5 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is a helpful tool in the treatment of hypoxaemic respiratory failure. However, the clinical parameters predicting the effectiveness of HFNC in coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) patients remain unclear.
Methods: Sixteen COVID-19 patients undergoing HFNC in the Asklepios Lung Clinic Munich-Gauting, Germany between 16 March and 3 June 2020 were retrospectively included into the study. Seven patients successfully recovered after HFNC (Group 1), while 9 patients required intubation upon HFNC failure (Group 2). Relevant predictors for an effective HFNC therapy were analysed on day 0 and 4 after HFNC initiation via receiver operating characteristics.
Results: The groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidities. Five patients died in Group 2 upon disease progression and HFNC failure. Group 1 required a lower oxygen supplementation (FiO2 0.46 [0.31-0.54] vs. 0.72 [0.54-0.76], P = 0.022) and displayed a higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio (115 [111-201] vs. 93.3 [67.2-145], P = 0.042) on day 0. In Group 2, fever persisted on day 4 (38.5 [38.0-39.4]°C vs. 36.5 [31.1-37.1]°C, P = 0.010). Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels > 108 mg L-1 (day 0) and persistent oxygen saturation < 89% and PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 91 (day 4) were identified as significant predictors for HFNC failure (area under curve 0.929, 0.933, and 0.893).
Conclusions: Elevated oxygen saturation, decreased FiO2 and reduced serum CRP on day 4 significantly predict HFNC effectiveness in COVID-19 patients. Based on these parameters, larger prospective studies are necessary to further investigate the effectiveness of HFNC in the treatment of COVID-19-associated hypoxaemic respiratory failure.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; high-flow therapy; intensive care; COVID-19.
 
Back
Top Bottom