• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Am J Emerg Med . Evaluation of limiting PEEP effectiveness in preventing barotrauma in critically ill COVID-19 patients: A retrospective study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Emerg Med


. 2025 Mar 27:93:73-79.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.03.050. Online ahead of print. Evaluation of limiting PEEP effectiveness in preventing barotrauma in critically ill COVID-19 patients: A retrospective study

Yuhei Irie[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yoshito Izutani[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Junta Noake[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Shun Ninomiya[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mami Kastumura[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Maiko Nakashio[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Junichi Maruyama[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yoshihiko Nakamura[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hiroyasu Ishikura[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 can cause acute respiratory distress syndrome, requiring prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation. However, patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation experience barotrauma. We assessed whether limiting the maximum positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may prevent barotrauma more effectively than using PEEP/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO[SUB]2[/SUB]) in patients with COVID-19 undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively included patients who met the diagnostic criteria at our center; they were divided into an ordinary PEEP group (PEEP/higher FiO[SUB]2[/SUB] table) and a limited PEEP group (maximum PEEP of <10 cmH[SUB]2[/SUB]O) during intensive care unit admission. We evaluated the maximum ventilator variables for mechanical ventilation and limited PEEP to inhibit barotrauma as the primary outcome.
Results: Patients in the ordinary PEEP group (n = 34) were significantly older and had higher body mass indexes than those in the limited PEEP group (n = 27). The maximum PEEP and maximum peak inspiratory pressure were significantly higher in the ordinary PEEP group than in the limited PEEP group. The ordinary PEEP group had a significantly higher incidence of barotrauma than the limited PEEP group.
Conclusions: Limiting the maximum PEEP to <10 cmH[SUB]2[/SUB]O may prevent barotrauma in patients with COVID-19 undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation.

Keywords: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Barotrauma; Coronavirus disease 2019; Mechanical ventilation; Positive end-expiratory pressure; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

 
Back
Top Bottom