tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Clin Pathol
. 2021 May 3;aqab060.
doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqab060. Online ahead of print.
Evaluation of a High-Definition PCR Assay for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Extracted and Nonextracted Respiratory Specimens Collected in Various Transport Media
Blake W Buchan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Derek Gerstbrein[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Amorina Cruz[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jess Hoff[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Emily Sievert[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Nathan A Ledeboer[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Matthew L Faron[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Objectives: We conducted an analytic and clinical comparison of a novel high-definition polymerase chain reaction PCR (HDPCR) assay to traditional real-time PCR (RT-PCR) for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in upper respiratory specimens.
Methods: Analytic performance of RT-PCR, HDPCR, and extraction-free HDPCR was established through replicate testing of a serially diluted clinical specimen containing SARS-CoV-2. A clinical comparison of all 3 assays was conducted using 351 prospectively collected upper respiratory swab specimens obtained from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals collected in various transport media.
Results: RT-PCR and HDPCR assays using extracted nucleic acid demonstrated similar analytic limits of detection (LoD) and clinical performance, with 100% positive and negative agreement. Extraction-free HDPCR demonstrated a 1.5 to 2.0 log10 increase in LoD based on cycle threshold values. However, clinical performance of extraction-free HDPCR remained high, demonstrating 97.8% positive and 99.6% negative agreement with RT-PCR. An overall increase in "invalid" and "presumptive" results was observed when using the extraction-free method, but this was highly variable based on transport medium used.
Conclusions: HDPCR performs similar to RT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The use of an extraction-free HDPCR protocol maintained high clinical performance despite reduced analytic LoD, with the benefit of reduced hands-on time and cost of reagents associated with nucleic acid extraction.
Keywords: Extraction-free PCR; High-definition PCR; SARS-CoV-2.
. 2021 May 3;aqab060.
doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqab060. Online ahead of print.
Evaluation of a High-Definition PCR Assay for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Extracted and Nonextracted Respiratory Specimens Collected in Various Transport Media
Blake W Buchan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Derek Gerstbrein[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Amorina Cruz[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jess Hoff[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Emily Sievert[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Nathan A Ledeboer[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Matthew L Faron[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 33940605
- DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqab060
Abstract
Objectives: We conducted an analytic and clinical comparison of a novel high-definition polymerase chain reaction PCR (HDPCR) assay to traditional real-time PCR (RT-PCR) for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in upper respiratory specimens.
Methods: Analytic performance of RT-PCR, HDPCR, and extraction-free HDPCR was established through replicate testing of a serially diluted clinical specimen containing SARS-CoV-2. A clinical comparison of all 3 assays was conducted using 351 prospectively collected upper respiratory swab specimens obtained from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals collected in various transport media.
Results: RT-PCR and HDPCR assays using extracted nucleic acid demonstrated similar analytic limits of detection (LoD) and clinical performance, with 100% positive and negative agreement. Extraction-free HDPCR demonstrated a 1.5 to 2.0 log10 increase in LoD based on cycle threshold values. However, clinical performance of extraction-free HDPCR remained high, demonstrating 97.8% positive and 99.6% negative agreement with RT-PCR. An overall increase in "invalid" and "presumptive" results was observed when using the extraction-free method, but this was highly variable based on transport medium used.
Conclusions: HDPCR performs similar to RT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The use of an extraction-free HDPCR protocol maintained high clinical performance despite reduced analytic LoD, with the benefit of reduced hands-on time and cost of reagents associated with nucleic acid extraction.
Keywords: Extraction-free PCR; High-definition PCR; SARS-CoV-2.