• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Airborne transmission and precautions: facts and myths

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Hosp Infect. 2014 Dec 13. pii: S0195-6701(14)00370-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.11.005. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Airborne transmission and precautions: facts and myths.[/h] Seto WH[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Airborne transmission occurs only when infectious particles of <5μm, known as aerosols, are propelled into the air. The prevention of such transmission is expensive, requiring N95 respirators and negative pressure isolation rooms. This lecture first discussed whether respiratory viral infections are airborne with reference to published reviews of studies before 2008, comparative trials of surgical masks and N95 respirators, and relevant new experimental studies. However, the most recent experimental study, using naturally infected influenza volunteers as the source, showed negative results from all the manikins that were exposed. Modelling studies by ventilation engineers were then summarized to explain why these results were not unexpected. Second, the systematic review commissioned by the World Health Organization on what constituted aerosol-generating procedures was summarized. From the available evidence, endotracheal intubation either by itself or combined with other procedures (e.g. cardiopulmonary resuscitation or bronchoscopy) was consistently associated with increased risk of transmission by the generation of aerosols.
Copyright ? 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Airborne transmission; Influenza; N95 respirator; Respiratory virus; Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS); Surgical mask

PMID: 25578684 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25578684
 
Back
Top Bottom